| |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Tomeka Law, Commission Reporter
305-375-3864
|
|
|
1A
|
INVOCATION AS PROVIDED IN RULE 5.05 (H)
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Invocation was led by Chairman Oliver Gilbert III.
|
|
|
1B
|
ROLL CALL
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Chairman Oliver Gilbert III convened the Infrastructure, Innovation and Technology Committee (IITC) meeting at 11:06 am
In addition to the committee members, the following staff members were present:
~ Chief Operations Officer Jimmy Morales, Office of the Mayor;
~ Dr. Aneisha Daniel, Director, Miami-Dade Department of Solid Waste Management (SWM);
~ Mr. Jay Fink, Director, Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD);
~ Mr. James Kohnstamm, Director, Office of Innovation and Economic Development (OIED);
~ Assistant County Attorneys (ACA) Jorge Martinez-Estevez, Eduardo Gonzalez and Christopher Wahl; and
~ Deputy Clerks Kerry Khunjar Breakenridge and Tomeka Law, Clerk of the Board.
MOTION TO SET AGENDA
ACA Christopher Wahl announced that pursuant to Board of County Commissioners (BCC/Board) Chairman Rodriguez�s memorandum dated July 7, 2025 entitled �Requested Changes to IITC agenda, Agenda Items 1F1, 2E, 3B Substitute, and 3C were added to today�s agenda. ACA Wahl also explained that Item 2F had been added but would be discussed later in the meeting. As the meeting progressed, Agenda Item 2G was added to the agenda.
Following the addition of Agenda Item 2F to the agenda, Chairman Gilbert opened the reasonable opportunity to be heard on the foregoing item, and seeing no one come forward to speak, closed the reasonable opportunity for the public to be heard.
Commissioner Higgins moved to approve the agenda with the aforementioned changes. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Cohen Higgins and upon being put to a vote, passed 5-0.
Commissioner Steinberg requested to be listed as a co-sponsor on Agenda Item 2E.
Commissioner Steinberg moved to consider Agenda Items 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2G, 3A, 3B, 3B Substitute simultaneously. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Higgins and upon being put to a vote, passed by a vote of 5-0.
Note: 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2G, 3A, 3B Substitute were forwarded to the Board of County of Commissioners (BCC/Board) with a favorable recommendation.
Following the consideration of all agenda items, Commissioner Regalado requested that items related to the Water and Sewer Department be forwarded to the July 16, 2025 Board of County Commissioners meeting.
Chairman Gilbert III indicated his intent to request that all items from today�s meeting be forwarded to the July 16, 2025 Board meeting.
|
|
|
1C
|
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Oliver Gilbert III.
|
|
|
1D
|
REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO BE HEARD AS PROVIDED IN RULE 6.06
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Chairman Gilbert opened the reasonable opportunity for the public to be heard, and the following persons appeared before the committee in support of Agenda Item 2B:
~ Noel Cleland, 5990 SW 50th Street, Miami, Florida
~ Catharina Bernabei, 1713 SW 103rd Place, Miami, Florida
~ Priscilla Carolyn Schmidt, 1595 NE 141st Street, North Miami, Florida
~ Marcelo Balladares, 16171 SW 73rd Street, Miami, Florida
~ Maddie Kaufman, 2508 SW 19th Terrace, Miami, Florida
~ Berenice Yanez, 500 NE 29th Street, Apt. 1108, Miami, Florida
~ Katherine Accardi, 816 NW 11th Street, Miami, Florida
~ Steven Leidner, 1130 102nd Street, Bay Harbor Islands, Florida
Seeing no one else come forward to speak, Chairman Gilbert III closed the reasonable opportunity for the public to be heard.
|
|
|
1E
|
SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S)
|
| |
|
1F
|
DISCUSSION ITEM(S)
|
| |
|
1F1
|
|
| |
251434
|
Discussion Item
|
|
| |
|
| |
DISCUSSION ITEM REGARDING ORDINANCE APPROVING, ADOPTING, AND RATIFYING NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT ROLLS, RATES, AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE AREA OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, COMMENCING OCTOBER 1, 2025; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, EXCLUSION FROM THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE [FILE NUMBER 251394]
|
Presented
|
| |
REPORT:
Dr. Aneisha Daniel provided an overview of the department's financial and operational situation. She reported that the department had achieved nearly $5 million in net cost savings through reduced overtime, operational efficiencies, program modifications, improved route logistics, and redirecting collections from transfer stations directly to landfills. Dr. Daniel explained that while the department saved over $8 million in certain areas, additional costs in fleet operations and construction resulted in a net savings of approximately $5 million.
Dr. Daniel highlighted significant cost pressures facing the department, including a 45 percent increase in fleet costs within the past year and ongoing expenses for 40-year and 50-year facility recertifications with rising construction and equipment costs. She noted that collective bargaining agreements mandating merit increases and cost-of-living adjustments represented the bulk of the department's expenses, which were beyond the department's control.
Dr. Daniel emphasized that despite these challenges, the department maintained excellent service quality with a complaint ratio of less than 0.001 percent. She reported that continued population growth, particularly in south Miami-Dade County, required additional services including more trucks, routes, and personnel, further increasing costs. Dr. Daniel acknowledged that while the approved 1 percent fee increase was less than the requested 2 percent, it would allow the department to continue providing current service levels, though higher fee increases would likely be necessary in subsequent years to cover rising costs.
Commissioner Regalado identified several potential waste management opportunities for cost savings and revenue generation, including cardboard and yard waste management. She expressed frustration regarding the lack of detailed information in the department's report and emphasized that a formal Request for Information or Request for Proposals process would be necessary to obtain proprietary information from private sector partners.
Commissioner Regalado proposed expanding the mini dump at Chapman Field to handle yard waste, noting this would benefit her district by reducing hauling distances. She indicated her support for composting initiatives as a means of reducing overall trash volume while acknowledging the financial challenges of incentivizing participation, noting that her district's Pine Crest composting program was funded through district funds rather than generating revenue.
Commissioner Regalado asked whether methane extraction projects could be completed within the current fiscal year and the potential impact on the following fiscal year's budget. She questioned Dr. Daniel's statement that fee increases would be inevitable, suggesting that the Board could implement various initiatives to avoid such increases.
Dr. Daniel responded that the renewable natural gas project would require approximately 18 months to construct and would generate revenue for disposal operations, not the collection fund, as these were budgeted separately. She stated that the project was projected to generate approximately $1 million annually upon completion. Dr. Daniel informed the committee that the department had made adjustments to the bulking program, separating clean yard trash from other bulk items at Trash and Recycling Centers to enable mulching and beneficial reuse at landfills, thereby optimizing waste management and resource recovery.
Commissioner Regalado contested the 18-month timeline, asserting that the renewable natural gas project could be completed within 12 months, allowing six months for revenue collection within the following fiscal year. She maintained that the department could expand yard waste collection and mulching programs, as other County departments could benefit from the mulch produced. However, Commissioner Regalado expressed concerns about invasive vegetation that could create environmental problems if included in mulching operations. She reiterated that the department should consider the benefits of extending mini dump operations rather than focusing solely on associated costs.
Commissioner Regalado emphasized that the most significant challenge remained the costs associated with waste collection. She stated there were multiple opportunities within the system to reduce costs and generate revenue, suggesting that various solutions could be combined to improve the financial situation.
Commissioner Regalado advocated for methane collection even without revenue generation due to its benefit in eliminating landfill odors, as current methane burning contributed significantly to unpleasant smells. She expressed support for expanding mini dumps and emphasized that her district residents were not opposed to such facilities when their utility and benefits were properly explained.
Chairman Gilbert III emphasized that the committee's primary goal was to identify ways to mitigate natural increases in waste collection costs while balancing environmental responsibility with financial practicality. He clarified that based on direction from the Board Chairman, any savings achieved must first be applied toward mitigating natural program cost increases.
Chairman Gilbert III stated that while he supported environmental innovations, in a year focused on minimizing cost increases, the committee should prioritize cost-neutral or cost-saving initiatives.
Vice Chairwoman Higgins recalled that several years prior, the department had faced severe financial difficulties under previous leadership that nearly resulted in reducing garbage collection from twice weekly to once weekly. She credited the current Board with properly funding the department to maintain modern service levels and support innovation toward zero waste goals. Vice Chairwoman Higgins expressed concern that the 1 percent fee increase might prove insufficient, potentially forcing the department to borrow from reserves and return to the problematic practices of previous boards. She emphasized that garbage collection represented one of the essential services that residents expect, along with public safety and emergency services. Vice Chairwoman Higgins requested Dr. Daniel's assessment of when service reductions might become necessary if the department remained inadequately funded.
Dr. Daniel responded that with the approved 1 percent increase, the department projected an $8 million deficit by 2028, increasing to a $56 million deficit over the five-year projection period. She stated that at that point, the department would face limited options: borrowing from the disposal fund, increasing fees, or reducing service to once-weekly garbage pickup. Dr. Daniel noted that borrowing from the disposal fund would become increasingly difficult as landfills approached end-of-life and disposal revenues declined.
Vice Chairwoman Higgins clarified that she had been working for nearly a year to make composting legal in Miami-Dade County, addressing misinformation circulating on social media alleging she was attempting to stop composting and bankrupt composters. She explained that current composting operations existed outside the legal framework, as county code did not permit composting. Vice Chairwoman Higgins reported that she had worked with the Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) and the Solid Waste Department to allow existing composters to continue operations as pilot projects while developing appropriate legislation. She emphasized the complexity of creating composting regulations that would satisfy both environmental protection requirements to prevent groundwater contamination and bond covenant obligations. Vice
Chairwoman Higgins stated that she expected to present composting permit legislation in September after resolving technical and legal details.
Chairman Gilbert III clarified that reducing services did not simply mean a proportional cost reduction, as cutting garbage pickups in half did not yield equivalent savings. He emphasized the human cost of service reductions, noting that decreased services would necessarily result in workforce reductions and fewer vehicles. Chairman Gilbert III stated that the committee's responsibility was to identify efficiencies and innovations that would maintain service levels while managing costs appropriately for residents.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins expressed appreciation for the detailed discussion but requested but requested justification for the substantial fee increase over the previous five years, noting that solid waste fees had risen from $440 to over $700, an increase of nearly fifty percent. She projected that at this rate, residents would pay over one thousand dollars in solid waste fees before the end of her term if reelected. Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated she had not yet received a presentation justifying such a significant rate increase and indicated she would need to review the detailed information and conduct a thorough analysis before the next hearing.
Dr. Daniel explained that the increase represented a necessary reset after years of no fee increases despite continuing cost escalations. She noted that when fees were increased, they typically rose by only $25 rather than the requested $50, resulting in chronic underfunding that created the need for substantial catch-up increases.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins questioned whether the department had implemented the Mayor's directive for a 10 percent budget reduction across all departments.
Dr. Daniel confirmed that the administration had requested cost reductions and the department had identified areas for savings. However, she emphasized that enterprise departments faced limitations on achievable cuts. She explained that the department had slowed some projects to achieve savings, though construction cost inflation meant that even delayed projects ultimately cost more than originally budgeted.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated that in the current financial climate where every department, enterprise or not, faced pressure to reduce costs due to the county's budgetary gap, she struggled to see justification for increasing fees on residents. She acknowledged that the department might cite the budget gap as justification for fee increases, but emphasized she needed to see clear justification, which had not yet been provided. Commissioner Cohen Higgins indicated she would examine the detailed spreadsheet provided and conduct offline discussions before the next hearing.
Chairman Gilbert III sought clarification on whether enterprise funds were included in the 10 percent reduction directive, noting he understood that instruction applied primarily to general fund departments and non-constitutional offices.
Chief Operating Officer Jimmy Morales clarified that the Mayor challenged all departments, including proprietary funds, to identify inefficiencies and cost-saving opportunities. He confirmed that the main focus remained on bridging the general fund gap, where significant cuts were necessary. Mr. Morales stated that proprietary departments were encouraged to identify efficiencies but were not subjected to the same level of cuts as general fund departments. He noted that most proprietary departments, including the airport and seaport, maintained healthier funding streams, while solid waste and the Department of Transportation and Public Works faced greater challenges. Mr. Morales explained that one factor enabling historically low solid waste rates was that the disposal side had subsidized the collection side, unlike other municipalities such as Miami and Coral Gables that used general fund subsidies to reduce apparent rates. He emphasized the effort to ensure charges reflected actual costs while continuing to seek savings and revenue opportunities.
Commissioner Regalado noted that while landfill closure would reduce tipping fee revenue, methane extraction from closed landfills could continue generating revenue for up to 25 years, albeit at lower rates than active tipping operations. She criticized what she perceived as a lack of long-term planning and limited options for reducing operating costs within the department. Commissioner Regalado emphasized the need to begin methane collection to address both revenue and environmental concerns.
Mr. Morales acknowledged the value of innovative solutions while noting that the department's revenue relied heavily on landfill tipping fees, which generated $60 million the previous year from two landfills. He indicated that landfill closures would necessitate planning for significant revenue decreases, as methane collection would generate only approximately $1 million annually.
Commissioner Steinberg suggested evaluating the financial impact of a 1.5 percent fee increase, advocating for a balanced approach incorporating efficiency improvements, moderate fee increases, and protection of general fund resources while planning for future needs.
Chairman Gilbert III observed that municipalities like the City of Miami could more easily use general fund dollars for waste collection because their entire city served as the customer base. He noted the complexity of using Countywide general funds for services that did not benefit all county residents, expressing uncertainty about the legal implications of such an approach.
Chairman Gilbert III clarified that previous composting pilots did not violate law, characterizing them as experimental programs using appropriate discretion.
Chairman Gilbert III emphasized the importance of understanding how the department arrived at its current financial situation, noting the stark fee increases that occurred during his tenure on the Commission. He expressed openness to identifying inefficiencies to reduce costs while ensuring adequate funding for necessary services. Chairman Gilbert III observed that some enterprise funds, including transit, no longer truly operated as enterprise funds because the county did not expect services to be self-sustaining, recognizing that affordable fares were essential for economic mobility.
Chairman Gilbert III noted that enterprise funds like airports and seaports maintained financial viability due to their revenue models, while transit and solid waste required different considerations. He emphasized that residents' expectation for reliable waste collection paralleled their expectation for clean water, creating a fundamental service obligation. Chairman Gilbert III recounted his early work as a commissioner partnering with Miami Gardens to address illegal dumping without charging fees, noting that while the department now performed better under Dr. Daniel's leadership.
Chairman Gilbert acknowledged the importance of efficiencies Commissioner Regalado identified, noting that while methane collection might generate only $1 million compared to $60 million in landfill revenues, it represented $1 million that would not need to be passed on to residents through fee increases. He emphasized that incremental savings would accumulate meaningfully. Chairman Gilbert noted that most proposed innovations would not affect the current year's fee but questioned whether any efficiencies could be implemented to minimize the current increase.
Commissioner Regalado III emphasized the need to change the department's mindset regarding disposal operations. She stated that losing landfills did not mean abandoning disposal revenue opportunities, noting that methane collection and partnerships with municipalities for transfer station operations could generate disposal fees without county ownership of facilities. Commissioner Regalado expressed confidence that such approaches would not violate bond covenants, given the county's substantial waste stream. She criticized the extended timeframe for methane collection implementation, noting that legal proceedings regarding lease versus easement arrangements had consumed two to three years when solutions could have been reached more expeditiously.
Commissioner Regalado urged reconsidering the disposal fund's purpose, stating that while she disagreed with using disposal fees to subsidize collection, she supported using such fees for infrastructure improvements. She suggested that disposal fees could fund additional mini dumps and enhancements to existing facilities, enabling residents to dispose of waste without requiring collection services. Commissioner Regalado noted the frequency of bulky waste pickups in unincorporated areas and proposed that accessible disposal sites would reduce collection needs and prevent neighborhood dumping that occurred when residents added items to existing waste piles. She advocated for rethinking operations, investing in infrastructure, and changing service delivery methods, emphasizing that many residents would utilize alternative disposal options if made available. Commissioner Regalado suggested commercializing some operations, noting that landscapers and gardeners would pay tipping fees at convenient mini dump locations rather than traveling across the County.
Chairman Gilbert III thanked Commissioner Regalado and recognized Commissioner Steinberg, who inquired whether the Board could legally adjust rates mid-year if efficiencies were identified after setting the initial rate for the upcoming fiscal year.
ACA Jorge Martinez-Estevez stated that the Board had previously issued refunds in special taxing districts when savings were achieved during the year, allowing ratepayers to benefit from accomplished savings.
Chairman Gilbert III noted this response did not address the specific question about lowering rates mid-year, recalling that he had asked this question at the commission meeting without receiving a direct answer. He stated he did not understand why the Board could not lower a rate mid-year if it had initially set it at a higher level.
ACA Jorge Martinez-Estevez indicated the question required further research but expressed concern that Florida Statute which enabled adding non-ad valorem assessments to tax bills, required rates to be set at public hearings between January and September 25th and submitted to the property appraiser and tax collector for inclusion on tax bills. He stated he was not aware of any provision allowing rate adjustments after bills were sent in November.
Chairman Gilbert III emphasized the distinction between adjusting rates generally and specifically lowering rates, suggesting there might be flexibility for rate reductions. He questioned the legal basis for a lawsuit, noting that plaintiffs would be challenging a reduction in their fees.
Mr. Morales voiced concerns regarding rate reductions after tax bills were issued, questioning whether refunds would be necessary since property tax bills were paid in a single transaction.
Commissioner Regalado reported she had researched the issue and found that some jurisdictions applied savings as credits to the following year's bills rather than issuing refunds, which would be cost-prohibitive given administrative expenses.
Chairman Gilbert III agreed that applying savings as credits to subsequent years would be preferable and would minimize expenses compared to issuing individual refund checks.
ACA Jorge Martinez-Estevez confirmed that both issuing refund checks and applying credits to subsequent years would be acceptable methods if savings were achieved during the year.
Commissioner Regalado noted a potential issue where property ownership changes between years could result in credits benefiting subsequent owners rather than those who paid the original fee. However, she suggested this could be addressed through proper notice and contractual arrangements, particularly given the relatively small amounts involved.
Chairman Gilbert III stated that such credits would run with the property and could be managed appropriately. He expressed preference for finding ways to mitigate increases needed in subsequent years through mid-year savings, either through refunds or credits.
Commissioner Regalado suggested that mid-year notices could be sent to residents informing them of upcoming credits.
Chairman Gilbert III noted the expense of County mailings and observed that the County sent substantial amounts of mail across departments, representing a potential area for budget savings.
Dr. Daniel concluded by stating that the department thoroughly reviewed every recommendation submitted by the Board and would continue doing so. She expressed her goal of ensuring the department evolved to become the most efficient and sustainable solid waste department possible.
|
|
|
1G
|
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
|
| |
|
2
|
COUNTY COMMISSION
|
| |
|
2A
|
|
| |
251039
|
Resolution
|
Marleine Bastien
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO CONDUCT A STUDY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE ENACTMENT OR IMPLEMENTATION OF IMPROVED DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ESTABLISHMENTS, TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ZERO WASTE MASTER PLAN ANY DESIGN-RELATED INITIATIVES THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE DEEMS APPROPRIATE, AND TO PROVIDE A REPORT
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 5 - 0
|
|
2B
|
|
| |
251068
|
Resolution
|
Marleine Bastien
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EVALUATE THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING INCENTIVE-BASED PROGRAMS TO ENCOURAGE WASTE DIVERSION AND RECYCLING COLLECTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PAY-AS-YOU-THROW AND WASTE REDUCTION REBATE PROGRAMS; DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO RECOMMEND THE MOST COST EFFECTIVE INCENTIVE-BASED PROGRAM FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES, AND IDENTIFY LEGALLY AVAILABLE FUNDS OR FUNDING SOURCES IN AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO IMPLEMENT AND SUSTAIN SUCH INCENTIVE-BASED PROGRAM; AND PROVIDE A REPORT
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 5 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
Commissioner Higgins noted that low-income households tended to generate more waste due to larger numbers of residents living within individual homes. She cautioned the administration to consider the financial impact on low-income households when proposing waste fees based on household trash disposal amounts.
Commissioner Higgins requested that the proposed resolution be amended to include language ensuring no adverse effect on low-income households prior to adoption by the Board.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins inquired about the upcoming waste-to-energy item.
Mr. Morales confirmed that the item was scheduled to be considered at the upcoming July 16, 2025 Board meeting.
There being no further comments or questions, the Committee proceeded to vote on the foregoing resolution as presented.
|
|
|
2C
|
|
| |
251069
|
Resolution
|
Marleine Bastien
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO ESTABLISH OR ENHANCE COMPREHENSIVE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLID WASTE REDUCTION, AND RECYCLING PROGRAMS IN MULTIFAMILY, COMMERCIAL, AND MIXED-USE PROPERTIES AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS; AND TO PROVIDE A REPORT
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 5 - 0
|
|
2D
|
|
| |
251344
|
Resolution
|
Raquel A. Regalado
Sen. Rene Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXPLORE CREATION OF MINI DUMPS FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF YARD WASTE THROUGHOUT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND PROVIDE A REPORT
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 5 - 0
|
|
2E
|
|
| |
251389
|
Resolution
|
Raquel A. Regalado
Sen. Rene Garcia
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO RETAIN AN EASEMENT OR OTHER SIMILAR RIGHTS FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF WATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE AND TO MEET OTHER CURRENT OR FUTURE NEEDS OF THE MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT, WHEN CONVEYING OR LEASING COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTY
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 5 - 0
|
|
2F
|
|
| |
251463
|
Resolution
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO: (1) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO A MUNICIPAL UTILITY TO CONDUCT WATER AND/OR SEWER CONSTRUCTION, (A) OBTAIN PROOF IN WRITING THAT ALL MUNICIPALITIES WITHIN WHICH THE CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE HAVE CONSENTED TO THE TIMING OF SUCH WORK BEING PERFORMED AND (B) REQUIRE THAT THE MUNICIPAL UTILITY PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THAT WERE AGREED UPON BETWEEN THE MUNICIPALITIES TO CONNECT WITH OR USE THE UTILITY IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 180.19, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND (2) CREATE A STANDARD FORM, PROVIDING AN EXCEPTION
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 4 - 1
No: Steinberg
|
| |
REPORT:
Commissioner Cohen Higgins expressed concern that requiring consent from municipal partners for water and sewer construction permits could lead to conflicts, given multiple ongoing projects across the County under the consent decree. She suggested that providing notice to municipal partners would sufficiently coordinate work while accelerating the formal process.
Chairman Gilbert III clarified that the resolution pertained to municipalities providing water services outside their city limits, not County projects. He emphasized the necessity of coordinating permit timelines and noted that Florida statutes required municipalities to maintain formal agreements when providing services beyond their boundaries. Chairman Gilbert III recalled an incident where the City of North Miami Beach commenced a project two hours before a well-attended soccer match at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, causing cascading traffic delays throughout the city.
Commissioner Regalado noted that when the police operated under County control, information about such projects was disseminated through law enforcement coordination, but that information sharing had ceased after police services transferred to the Sheriff.
Commissioner Steinberg expressed the need to review the legislation to prevent unintended consequences affecting cities in her district.
Commissioner Regalado agreed and suggested establishing a defined timeframe for municipalities to respond to notices, addressing and resolving potential conflicts.
Chairman Gilbert III emphasized the importance of coordinating infrastructure projects with municipalities to avoid overlapping with major events, ensuring timely completion and minimal disruption.
There being no further comments or questions, the Committee proceeded to vote on the foregoing resolution as presented.
Immediately following the vote, Commissioner Steinberg expressed concerns about the legislation�s effects on municipalities in her district and requested that her vote be changed to �no�.
|
|
|
2G
|
|
| |
251467
|
Resolution
|
Raquel A. Regalado
Sen. Rene Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXPLORE EXECUTING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT FOR COMBINED BIOSOLIDS AND SOLID WASTE HAULING AND DISPOSAL; EVALUATE COST-EFFECTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR UPGRADING CLASS B BIOSOLIDS INTO CLASS A BIOSOLIDS; AND PROVIDE A REPORT
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 5 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
ACA Christopher Wahl read the title of the foregoing proposed resolution into the record.
It was moved by Commissioner Regalado that the foregoing item be added to the agenda. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Higgins and upon being put to a vote, passed 5-0.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the reasonable opportunity to be heard, and seeing no one come forward to speak, closed the reasonable opportunity for the public to be heard.
There being no further comments or questions, the Committee proceeded to vote on the foregoing resolution as presented.
|
|
|
|
DEPARTMENT(S)
|
| |
|
3A
|
|
| |
251355
|
Resolution
|
|
Water & Sewer Department |
| |
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT NO. W-16046, HIALEAH FILTER BACKWASH ELEVATED TANK, TO RF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $6,160,980.00 AND A CONTRACT TERM OF 561 CALENDAR DAYS; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO UTILIZE THE MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT�S CONSENT DECREE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ACCELERATION ORDINANCE, SECTION 2-8.2.12 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO MANAGE CONTRACT NO. W-16046; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND TO EXERCISE THE TERMINATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 5 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
Commissioner Cohen Higgins raised concerns about discrepancies between estimates provided by vendors and those from County engineers. She noted that vendor estimates for the contracts referenced in the Agenda Items 3A and 3B were significantly higher, 33 percent and 25 percent, respectively, prompting questions about whether baseline budgets with defined thresholds existed and about the reliability of estimates provided by County engineers.
Mr. Jay Fink noted that rising contractor costs were part of a broader industry trend impacting Miami-Dade County. He clarified that engineer estimates were based on historical data from comparable past projects, while bid evaluations involved reviewing and comparing proposals from various businesses to ensure consistency in costs, products, services, and labor. Mr. Fink noted that when significant discrepancies arose, the department consulted engineers to understand baseline assumptions regarding supply and demand factors. He explained that Agenda Item 3A involved vertical construction (water tank erection) with primarily material costs, while Agenda Item 3B involved horizontal construction (pipeline slip-lining) with more intensive labor requirements. Mr. Fink stated that competitive bidding with multiple contractors submitting similar bids indicated appropriate pricing, while wide variations among bids suggested some contractors lacked interest in the project.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins emphasized the need for maintaining consistent, comparable estimates within a reasonable range, stressing the importance of internal professionals' estimates accurately reflecting actual costs. She maintained that reliance on accurate estimates preserved the value of engineers' input and ensured decisions were based on reliable data rather than allowing external factors or business community influence to determine cost assessments.
Chairman Gilbert III questioned the timing of estimates provided by engineers and vendors, noting that contracts included Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments for anticipated increases. He inquired whether actual increases exceeded expectations.
Mr. Fink confirmed that increases exceeded expectations and explained that engineers established baselines and then incorporated CPI adjustments to determine final costs.
Chairman Gilbert III suggested reconsidering how baselines were calculated, potentially improving the accuracy of estimates provided by County engineers by accounting for both CPI adjustments and actual business costs.
Commissioner Regalado suggested that discrepancies in project estimates stemmed from labor costs requiring specialized expertise and experience.
Mr. Fink agreed that labor costs varied significantly depending on project type. He noted that vertical construction was generally less labor-intensive and more cost-effective, while horizontal construction incurred higher costs due to increased labor requirements. Mr. Fink emphasized the importance of recognizing these differences when analyzing projects and stated that competitive bidding with strategies tailored to specific project types could assist in identifying lower bids.
Commissioner Regalado suggested reviewing the bidding process to evaluate material and labor costs separately to better identify cost drivers.
There being no further comments or questions, the Committee proceeded to vote on the foregoing resolutions as presented.
|
|
|
3B
|
|
| |
251357
|
Resolution
|
|
Water & Sewer Department |
| |
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT NO. S-14057, REHABILITATION OF A 54-INCH PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE CYLINDER PIPE (PCCP) FORCE MAIN ON WEST FLAGER STREET, TO DAVID MANCINI AND SONS, INC. FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $5,959,981.88 AND A CONTRACT PERIOD OF 360 CALENDAR DAYS; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO UTILIZE THE MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT�S CONSENT DECREE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ACCELERATION ORDINANCE, SECTION 2-8.2.12 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO MANAGE CONTRACT NO. S-14057; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND TO EXERCISE THE TERMINATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN
|
Withdrawn
|
| |
REPORT:
See Agenda Item 3B Substitute, Legislative File No. 251455 for the substitute version.
|
|
|
3B Substitute
|
|
| |
251455
|
Resolution
|
|
Water & Sewer Department |
| |
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT NO. S-14057, REHABILITATION OF A 54-INCH PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE CYLINDER PIPE (PCCP) FORCE MAIN ON WEST FLAGER STREET, TO DAVID MANCINI AND SONS, INC. FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $5,959,981.88 AND A CONTRACT PERIOD OF 396 CALENDAR DAYS; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO UTILIZE THE MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT�S CONSENT DECREE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ACCELERATION ORDINANCE, SECTION 2-8.2.12 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO MANAGE CONTRACT NO. S-14057; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND TO EXERCISE THE TERMINATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 251357]
|
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation
Mover: Micky Steinberg
Seconder: Eileen Higgins
Vote: 5 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
See report under Agenda Item 3A, Legislative File No. 251355.
|
|
|
3C
|
|
| |
251353
|
Resolution
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO PREPARE AND FILE INCORPORATION DOCUMENTS FOR A NEW NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION TO BE NAMED ''RISK AND RESILIENCE TECH HUB, INC.'', OR SIMILAR NAME, PURSUANT TO THE REGIONAL INNOVATION AND TECH HUB GRANT AWARD TO MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FROM THE UNITED STATES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION (EDA); DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO PROVIDE IN SUCH INCORPORATION DOCUMENTS THAT THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE CORPORATION IS TO ADVANCE SOUTH FLORIDA AS A GLOBAL LEADER IN RESILIENCE TECHNOLOGY THROUGH INNOVATION, COMMERCIALIZATION, AND JOB CREATION; DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO APPOINT AN INITIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR RISK AND RESILIENCE TECH HUB, INC.; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A SUB-GRANT AGREEMENT WITH RISK AND RESILIENCE TECH HUB, INC. FOR THAT ENTITY TO RECEIVE ALL FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS AWARDED TO THE COUNTY, IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $3,200,000.00 PURSUANT TO THE EDA GRANT, AS ALLOWABLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW AND WHICH SHALL BE FULLY FUNDED BY THE EDA, PROVIDED THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ARE SATISFIED; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH RISK AND RESILIENCE TECH HUB, INC. TO MANAGE THE COUNTY�S REGIONAL INNOVATION AND TECH HUB GRANT WITH THE EDA, TO THE EXTENT ALLOWABLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW AND WHICH SHALL BE AT NO COST TO THE COUNTY, PROVIDED THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ARE SATISFIED; WAIVING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. R-130-06; AND WAIVING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. R-134-25
|
Forwarded to BCC without a recommendation
Mover: Raquel A. Regalado
Seconder: Oliver G. Gilbert, III
Vote: 5 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
Commissioner Higgins raised concerns about moving the tech hub outside of County control as it related to maintaining local benefits and accountability. She referenced the Vizcaya Museum transition to a 501(c)(3) organization that became completely independent of County control with no County employees on loan and no workforce or fiscal impact to the County. Commissioner Higgins expressed concern that County employees would still be involved in the tech hub transition according to the proposed resolution.
Chairman Gilbert III acknowledged that removing the department from County oversight would result in the discontinuation of those employees' service to the County, consistent with reductions occurring in other departments, and welcomed his colleagues input for amendments.
Chief Operating Officer Jimmy Morales expressed the administration's support for the item and assured that if adopted, no County personnel would be utilized after the transition.
Commissioner Higgins requested clarification about the status of current tech hub employees and other personnel. She suggested deferring the item to incorporate requirements that personnel be residents of Miami-Dade County rather than other States, recalling that during a previous meeting, the proposed executive director resided in the Midwest.
Chairman Gilbert III inquired about the critical nature of timing for federal funding, which Mr. Morales confirmed was a consideration.
Mr. James Kohnstamm explained that the two County employees working on the tech hub, had discontinued their employment with the County and were not transitioning into the hub. He stated that Economic Development Administration (EDA) funding provided for two positions, Deputy Regional Innovation Officer and Project Manager, which the County could fill; but those employees would be expected to fully transition to the tech hub.
Mr. Kohnstamm noted that Cesi de Quesada Covey currently served as Interim Regional Innovation Officer on a pro bono basis, and a proposal had been submitted to secure additional private funding from the Knight Foundation to establish that role as a permanent position.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins advocated for deferral as questions remained unanswered regarding staffing and funding. She mentioned the 2023 approval of the Miami-Dade Innovation Authority (MDIA), a similar nonprofit entity that received $3 million in American Rescue Plan Act funding for comparable work. Commissioner Cohen Higgins questioned why a new independent board was needed rather than incorporating the tech hub into the existing MDIA.
Mr. Kohnstamm reiterated that creating the nonprofit entity was necessary to secure EDA funding and explained that the tech hub's mission differed from the Innovation Authority's focus on finding solutions to county problems.
Commissioner Regalado recalled discussions regarding the MDIA and noted that no programming had been delivered despite subsequent funding requests from the county. She expressed concerns about creating organizations that would seek County funding, emphasizing that spin-off organizations should be financially sustainable and independent of County funding, particularly given the absence of additional federal funding and the county's own financial challenges. Commissioner Regalado expressed support for the initiative contingent upon it remaining independent without county funding.
Mr. Morales reported that the tech hub had been awarded a $19.5 million grant with the condition that the recipient be an independent nonprofit entity, establishing the purpose of the proposed resolution.
Mr. Kohnstamm confirmed that the EDA approved the $19.5 million allocation, including $3.2 million for Miami-Dade County as a reimbursable grant for governance structure and program setup. He stated that due to the absence of additional federal funding, the entity had secured an additional $3 million from the Knight Foundation, conditional upon the project being independent of the County.
Commissioner Regalado requested that the conditions stated by Mr. Kohnstamm be explicitly included in the resolution.
Vice Chairwoman Higgins inquired about specific in-kind services the county would be expected to provide and sought clarification regarding the two positions funded by the EDA grant. She questioned whether the positions would replace existing staff or represent additional positions, emphasizing the need for transparency about funding sources and staffing implications for the County.
Mr. Kohnstamm clarified that the County would not fill the two roles; instead, they would be funded by the EDA allowing the tech hub to employ those individuals on a full-time basis. He explained that the grant allocated $333,000 over five years for in-kind services, mostly covered by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, with $94,000 over five years (approximately $18,000 annually) anticipated for county in-kind services related to staff management.
Chairman Gilbert III advised that all changes discussed during today�s meeting should be included and clearly stated within the resolution before submission to the Board for consideration.
There being no further comments or questions, the Committee voted to forward the foregoing proposed resolution to the Board without a recommendation.
|
|
|
4
|
COUNTY MAYOR
|
| |
|
5
|
COUNTY ATTORNEY
|
| |
|
6
|
CLERK OF THE BOARD
|
| |
|
7
|
REPORT(S)
|
| |
|
8
|
ADJOURNMENT
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
There being no further business to come before the Infrastructure, Innovation & Mobility Committee (IITC), the meeting was adjourned at 1:01 p.m.
|
|
|
| 8/7/2026 |
|
|
|
Agenda Key: 5293 |