Miami-Dade Legislative Item
File Number: 200911
    Clerk's Official Copy   

File Number: 200911 File Type: Ordinance Status: Adopted as amended
Version: 0 Reference: 20-37 Control: Board of County Commissioners
File Name: RELATING TO BID PROTEST PROCESS Introduced: 5/9/2020
Requester: NONE Cost: Final Action: 5/5/2020
Agenda Date: 5/5/2020 Agenda Item Number: 7E
Notes: THIS IS FINAL VERSION AS ADOPTED. ALSO SEE 200517, 200796. Title: ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE BID PROTEST PROCESS; AMENDING SECTION 2-8.4 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; REQUIRING COUNTY MAYOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS AND HEARING EXAMINER’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO BE PLACED ON THE NEXT AVAILABLE COMMISSION AGENDA UPON A FINDING BY A HEARING EXAMINER THAT THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR’S DESIGNEE ACTED FRAUDULENTLY, ARBITRARILY, ILLEGALLY, OR DISHONESTLY; PROHIBITING PROTESTS OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO REJECT ALL PROPOSALS; MAKING TECHNICAL CHANGES; DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR TO PREPARE CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-21 AND PROVIDE A REPORT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE [SEE ORIGINAL ITEMS UNDER FILE NOS. 200517, 200796]
Indexes: CONE OF SILENCE
  PROCUREMENT
  BID PROTEST
Sponsors: Audrey M. Edmonson, Prime Sponsor
  Rebeca Sosa, Co-Sponsor
Sunset Provision: No Effective Date: Expiration Date:
Registered Lobbyist: None Listed


Legislative History

Acting Body Date Agenda Item Action Sent To Due Date Returned Pass/Fail

County Attorney 5/9/2020 Assigned Oren Rosenthal 6/22/2020

Board of County Commissioners 5/5/2020 7E AMENDED Adopted as amended P
REPORT: Commissioner Higgins noted an amendment to the item, which was made by Vice Chairwoman Sosa that was read by Assistant County Attorney Oren Rosenthal. “The proposed amendment will be on handwritten page 9, and subsection 8. It will add the following at the end of the section: ‘Additionally, if the hearing examiner finds that there is a violation of the Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest and Code of Ethics Ordinance by any participant in the competitive process, the Clerk of the Board shall immediately provide copies of the protested recommendation, the Hearing Examiner’s report, and recommendation and all other documents and transcripts of the bid protest hearing to the Executive Director of the Miami-Dade County Commission on Ethics and the Public Trust.’” The amendment was moved by Chairwoman Edmonson and seconded by Vice Chairwoman Sosa. Commissioner Monestime expressed his concerns with the item because he felt the current process was efficient. He explained the current process required the staff recommendations and hearing examiner’s opinion to go directly to the Board. If the hearing examiner and staff disagreed, the proposer could go to the Board, who would then be able to vote on any protested item. It also allowed the County to take corrective action as applicable by law. He added the item removed the ability to protest and without recourse. Mr. Rosenthal explained under the proposed ordinance the Administration was not allowed to change recommendations prior to consideration by the Board. It also enabled the Board to hear recommendations from both the staff recommendations and the hearing examiner before making decisions. Furthermore, the Board still retained its legislative prerogatives in the award of the contract and the prosecution of procurement. Commissioner Monestime stated the current process was not cumbersome and he did not have any issues with it. He concluded he would not support the item. Vice Chairwoman Sosa reminded the Board since new commissioners were being elected and would be unfamiliar with the County’s laws, the current commissioners needed to provide all the information about the process of protested recommendations from all involved parties to the future newly elected commissioners. Mr. Rosenthal elaborated there were currently two parallel processes: the bid protest process and the commission on ethics process. Under the proposed amendment, if during the bid protest there was evidence of code of ethics or cone of silence violations this information would be forwarded to the chairperson of the Commission of Ethics and Public Trust (CEPT) during the parallel process of prosecuting the code of ethics. Commissioner Diaz voiced his support for the proposed amendment, however he asked who determined a violation. Mr. Rosenthal replied if there was a violation in the hearing examiner’s opinion, this would be conveyed in a report which would be forwarded to the chairperson of the CEPT. He also confirmed with Commissioner Diaz this information could be passed to other offices, such as the OIG. Mr. Rosenthal also clarified to Mayor Gimenez that under the current process the Administration was able to take corrective action on any issues with the bid process in response to the hearing examiner’s report before it went to the Board. The item involved the Board during the process before the Administration could take any corrective actions. Mayor Gimenez asked if he was prohibited from agreeing with the hearing examiner’s findings and was informed by Chairwoman Edmonson he would not be prohibited. Commissioner Monestime stated the item placed additional delays in the process which prevented the Mayor from taking expedient corrective actions before the reports went to the Board. Commissioners Heyman and Levine Cava agreed with his point. Commissioner Levine Cava suggested a workshop to examine all the contents of the processes and put them in the context of the overall procurement process. She also declared she would not support the item. Commissioner Diaz proposed an amendment which ensured all the findings, recommendations and information about the processes would be delivered to the Board. The amendment was seconded by Vice Chairwoman Sosa. Mayor Gimenez declared although he did not have any qualms with the hearing examiner’s reports going to the Board, he was concerned the item did not allow the Administration to concur with the hearing examiner during the period when both findings were presented to the Board. He stated as it was written in the item, he was not allowed to make corrections until after the findings were presented and he opined the Administration had the right to take correction actions. Chairwoman Edmonson responded the item permitted the Administration to make changes and recommendations, which included corrective actions, before its reports were presented. Commissioner Suarez voiced his concern over the issue of procurement, which he opined needed major reform. He added the item did not adequately reform the process and said he would not support the item. It was moved by Chairwoman Edmonson that the foregoing ordinance be amended to "be on handwritten page 9, and subsection 8. It will add the following at the end of the section: ‘Additionally, if the hearing examiner finds that there is a violation of the Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest and Code of Ethics Ordinance by any participant in the competitive process, the Clerk of the Board shall immediately provide copies of the protested recommendation, the Hearing Examiner’s report, and recommendation and all other documents and transcripts of the bid protest hearing to the Executive Director of the Miami-Dade County Commission on Ethics and the Public Trust.’” This motion was seconded by Vice Chairwoman Sosa, and upon being put to a vote, the item passed 9-4. Commissioners Higgins, Levine Cava, Suarez and Monestime voted "No".

Legislative Text


TITLE
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE BID PROTEST PROCESS; AMENDING SECTION 2-8.4 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; REQUIRING COUNTY MAYOR�S RECOMMENDATIONS AND HEARING EXAMINER�S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO BE PLACED ON THE NEXT AVAILABLE COMMISSION AGENDA UPON A FINDING BY A HEARING EXAMINER THAT THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE ACTED FRAUDULENTLY, ARBITRARILY, ILLEGALLY, OR DISHONESTLY; PROHIBITING PROTESTS OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO REJECT ALL PROPOSALS; MAKING TECHNICAL CHANGES; DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR TO PREPARE CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-21 AND PROVIDE A REPORT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE [SEE ORIGINAL ITEMS UNDER FILE NOS. 200517, 200796]

BODY
WHEREAS, section 2-8.4 of the Code of Miami-Dade County creates a bid protest procedure to hear administrative complaints regarding most competitive processes utilized by the County to purchase goods, supplies or services; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of a bid protest is to allow a neutral hearing examiner to hear evidence and argument and determine whether a procurement recommendation is free from any fraudulent, arbitrary, illegal, or dishonest conduct; and
WHEREAS, upon hearing a bid protest, the hearing examiner provides a report and recommendation to the Board setting forth the hearing examiner�s findings of facts and conclusions of law; and
WHEREAS, a hearing examiner�s recommended findings of facts and conclusions of law are not binding on the Board and often result in a time-consuming process of litigating the same issues before the Board; and
WHEREAS, requiring the County Mayor to resolicit a competitive procurement without going to the Board when a hearing examiner has found that the County Mayor or the County Mayor�s designee has acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally, or dishonestly will save time and allow for the proper completion of the competitive process without the potential for subsequent legal challenge; and
WHEREAS, in cases where the County Mayor still wishes to present to the Board a competitive process where the hearing examiner has found that the County Mayor has acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally, or dishonestly the County Mayor may recommend a waiver of the bid protest procedures or a competitive bid waiver,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMIDADE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section 2-8.4 of the Code of Miami-Dade County is hereby amended as follows:1
Sec. 2-8.4. - Protest procedures.
This section shall govern any protest made by a participant in any competitive process utilized for selection of a person or other entity to construct any public improvement, to provide any supplies, materials or services (including professional or management services other than professional services whose acquisition procedure is governed by the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act, F.S. Section 287.055 et seq.), or to lease any county property.

The foregoing notwithstanding, the protest procedures contained in this section shall not apply to contracts and purchases which the County [[Manager]]>>Mayor<< has the delegated authority to award under�Section 2-8.1(b) of this Code, and protests thereon shall be governed by procedures established by [[administrative]] >>implementing<< order approved by the Board of County Commissioners.

A protest hereunder may not challenge the relative weight of the evaluation criteria or the formula specified for assigning points therefor contained in bid, request for proposals ("RFP") or request for qualifications ("RFQ") specifications which have been approved by the Commission. >>A protest hereunder may not challenge any recommendation to reject all proposals received for a solicitation.<<

(a) Responsiveness. Prior to this Board or any committee thereof hearing any protests relating to a competitive bid, request for proposal or request for qualifications, the County [[Manager]]>>Mayor<< shall request the County Attorney to certify whether the bid or proposal in question is responsive. Upon receiving such request, the County Attorney shall, in consultation with the County [[Manager]]>>Mayor<< if necessary, determine whether the bid or proposal is responsive. This Board and any committee thereof shall be bound by the determination of the County Attorney with regard to the issue of responsiveness.

(b) A written intent to protest shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board and mailed to all participants in the competitive process and to the County Attorney within three (3) working days of the filing of the [[Manager�s]]>>Mayor�s<< recommendation. For purposes of calculating this period, the day of filing of the County [[Manager�s]]>>Mayor�s<< recommendation with the Clerk shall not be counted. Such written intent to protest shall state the particular grounds on which it is based and shall be accompanied by a filing fee. The protester shall then file all pertinent documents and supporting evidence with the Clerk of the Board and mail copies to all participants in the competitive process and to the County Attorney within three (3) working days after the filing of a written intent to protest. No bid protest shall be accepted unless it complies with the requirements of this Section. Notwithstanding the above, in the event that a public records request is made within the first three days of the above referenced period, a protester may utilize any public records obtained as evidence or additional grounds for protest, provided that, a) the protester met all the deadlines set forth above, and, b) a supplementary filing is made with the Clerk of the Board within 48 hours of receipt of the records responsive to the request.

(c) Protests filed in accordance herewith shall be referred to a hearing examiner. A hearing examiner shall be appointed not later than five (5) working days following the filing of a bid protest. The hearing examiner shall conduct a hearing in connection with the bid protest which shall be completed within ten (10) working days following his or her appointment. The hearing examiner shall, within five (5) working days of the hearing, file written findings and recommendations with the Clerk of the Board and shall submit or mail a copy of same to all participants in the competitive process and to the County Attorney. The hearing examiner may extend the deadline for completion of the hearing upon written petition for good cause shown, but such extension shall not exceed an additional five working (5) days. The hearing examiner shall consider the written protest and supporting documents and evidence appended thereto, the County [[Manager�s]]>>Mayor�s<< recommendation, and supporting documentation, and all evidence presented at the hearing. The hearing examiner may also require written summaries, proffers, affidavits and other documents the hearing examiner determines to be necessary in order to conclude the hearing and issue the report and recommendation within the time limits set forth in this ordinance. The hearing examiner shall be entitled to rely on evidence of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs, whether or not such evidence would be admissible in a trial in the courts of Florida.

(d) The hearing examiner shall allow a maximum of two hours for the protester's presentation of its protest and a maximum of two hours for the County's response to each protest. In the event of multiple protests, the hearing examiner shall allocate the time as necessary to ensure that the hearing shall not exceed one day.

(e) The County [[Manager]]>>Mayor<< shall prepare an [[administrative]] >>implementing<< order, to be approved by this Commission, amending [[Administrative]] >>implementing<< Order No. 3-21 and setting forth a fee schedule for filing of bid protests. The fee shall be in the amount necessary to defray the cost of the bid protest process established in this Section. The administrative order shall also establish the amount of compensation to be paid the hearing examiner, and shall provide for a prorated reduction of that compensation in the event the hearing examiner fails to abide by the time limitations set forth in�Section 2-8.4(c) above.

(f) Hearing examiners shall be selected from a panel of retired judges who have served ten (10) or more years as Circuit Judges in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida. Hearing examiners may be selected from alternate sources where the County Attorney recommends in writing that such action is necessary to achieve greater diversity.

(g) >>Unless the hearing examiner finds that the County Mayor or County Mayor�s designee acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally, or dishonestly,<< [T]>>t<>Mayor<<. Notice thereof shall be mailed to all participants in the competitive process at least five (5) days in advance of such presentation. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code or any prior resolution, the matter shall be heard by the Commission without prior presentation to any committee. The matter shall be resolved on the basis of the record before the hearing examiner and no evidence or issue which was not presented or raised at such hearing shall be considered. Presentations to the Commission by any participant in the competitive process or their representatives if authorized by subsection (h) below shall be limited to ten (10) minutes per side. The foregoing time limitation shall be inclusive of all speakers addressing the Commission on behalf of each side.

(h) If the hearing examiner concurs in the County [[Manager�s]]>>Mayor�s<< recommendation, a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the Commission members present shall be required to take other than the recommended action. Provided however, a two-thirds (2/3) vote shall not be required to reject all bids. If the hearing examiner concurs in the County [[Manager�s]]>>Mayor�s<< recommendation, the Commission shall not allow presentations by any participants in the competitive process or their representatives at the time the matter is presented to the Commission. If the hearing examiner does not concur in the County [[Manager�s]]>>Mayor�s<< recommendation >>and finds that the County Mayor or County Mayor�s designee acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally, or dishonestly or if the hearing examiner finds that there is a violation of the Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest and Code of Ethics Ordinance, including but not limited to the County�s Cone of Silence, by any participants in the competitive process, then the protested recommendation, any supplemental recommendations from the County Mayor and the hearing examiner�s report and recommendation shall be placed on the next available Commission agenda. The participants in the competitive process and their representatives may, at the discretion of the Chairperson, make presentations to the Commission and the Commission shall decide by majority vote whether to reject all proposals and resolicit the procurement, disqualify the recommended proposer, direct negotiations or award to the next ranked proposer, award to the recommended proposer or take any other action the Commission deems appropriate. Additionally, if the hearing examiner finds that there is a violation of the Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest and Code of Ethics Ordinance by any participants in the competitive process, the Clerk of the Board shall immediately provide copies of the protested recommendation, the hearing examiner�s report and recommendation, and all other documents and transcripts of the bid protest hearing to the Executive Director of the Miami-Dade County Commission on Ethics and the Public Trust.<<[[, the participants in the competitive process and their representatives may make presentations to the Commission and the Commission shall decide the matter by majority vote.]]

(i) The County [[Manager]]>>Mayor<< may provide different time periods for the taking of any actions required hereunder when the interest of the County so requires by including appropriate language in the specifications or addenda thereto.

(j) The foregoing notwithstanding, the Commission, by two-thirds (2/3) vote of the members present, may waive the requirements of this section and entertain a bid protest, upon written recommendation of the County [[Manager]]>>Mayor<<.

* * *

Section 2. The County Mayor or County Mayor�s designee shall prepare an amendment to Implementing Order 3-21, titled �Bid Protest Procedures,� to conform Implementing Order to the amendments made in this ordinance and shall place a report on an agenda of the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Ordinance No. 14-85 within 30 days of the effective date of this ordinance detailing such amendments.
Section 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or provision of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity.
Section 4. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance, shall be excluded from the Code of Miami-Dade County.
Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after the date of enactment unless vetoed by the Mayor, and if vetoed, shall become effective only upon an override by this Board.

1 Words stricken through and/or [[double bracketed]] shall be deleted. Words underscored and/or >>double arrowed<< constitute the amendment proposed. Remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged.



Home  |   Agendas  |   Minutes  |   Legislative Search  |   Lobbyist Registration  |   Legislative Reports
2024 BCC Meeting Calendar  |   Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances   |   ADA Notice  |  

Home  |  Using Our Site  |  About Phone Directory  |  Privacy  |  Disclaimer

E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster  

Web Site � 2024 Miami-Dade County.
All rights reserved.