| |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Jovel Shaw, Commission Reporter, (305) 375-1289
|
|
|
1A
|
INVOCATION AS PROVIDED IN RULE 5.05(H)
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Chairman Oliver G. Gilbert III led a prayer followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
|
|
|
1B
|
ROLL CALL
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Chairman Gilbert III convened the Board of County Commissioners (Board) meeting at 9:30 a.m.
In addition to Mayor Daniella Levine Cava and the Board members, the following staff members were in attendance:
-County Attorney (CA) Geri Bonzon-Keenan;
-First Assistant County Attorney Gerald Sanchez;
-Assistant County Attorneys (ACA) Michael Valdes, Melanie Spencer, Leigh Kobrinski, Shanika Graves;
- Cathy Burgos, Chief Community Services Officer, Office of the Mayor;
- Jimmy Morales, Chief Operations Officer, Office of the Mayor;
- Mr. Raymond Hall, Director, Miami-Dade County Internal Services Department (ISD);
-
Mr. Raied �Ray� Jadallah, Fire Chief, Miami-Dade Fire Rescue (MDFR);
-
Mr. Michael Barrios, Lieutenant, Miami-Dade Police Department Marine Patrol Unit;
-
Ms. Lisa Spadafina, Director, Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM);
-
Mr. David Clodfelter, Director, Office of Management and Budget (OMB);
-
Mr. Clarence Brown, Deputy Director, Public Housing and Community Development (PHCD);
-
Dr. Aneisha Daniel, Director, Miami-Dade County Department of Solid Waste Management (DSWM); and
- Deputy Clerks Basia Pruna, Jovel Shaw and Kerry Khunjar Breakenridge, Clerk of the Board.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the meeting by acknowledging that there were a number of significant issues before the Board that day. He proceeded to outline the decorum and procedures that would govern the meeting. Chairman Gilbert III explained that the Board would address preliminary business matters first, after which they would move to the reasonable opportunity to be heard portion of the meeting. During this segment, he indicated that each speaker would be allotted one minute to present their remarks.
Following these initial procedural announcements, Chairman Gilbert III informed those present that the Board would convene in a shade session at 9:45 a.m. He clarified that this closed session was necessary to discuss pending litigation that required private deliberation. Chairman Gilbert III further indicated that immediately following the conclusion of the shade session, the Board would proceed directly into the reasonable opportunity to be heard.
Chairman Gilbert III subsequently announced the formal commencement of the closed attorney-client session, which would specifically address the Rapid Transit Zone (RTZ) litigation pending between Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami. He estimated that the closed session would last approximately fifteen minutes and listed the Board members in attendance as follows: Chairman Gilbert III; Vice Chairman Rodriguez; Commissioners Bastien, Bermudez, Cabrera, Gonzalez, Hardemon, Cohen Higgins, Higgins, McGhee, Regalado, Steinberg; and Senator Garcia. Chairman Gilbert noted in addition to Mayor Levine Cava, County Attorney Geri Bonzon-Keenan; First Assistant County Attorney Gerald Sanchez; Executive Assistant County Attorney Jess McCarty; and Assistant County Attorneys Lauren Morse, Bruce Libhaber, and Michael Valdes would also be in attendance.
The Board recessed at 9:46 a.m. and proceeded to the conference room for the closed shade session.
The Board resumed its Regular Board meeting at 10:33 a.m.
|
|
|
1C
|
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
1D
|
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS (SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AT 8:30 AM)
|
| |
|
1E
|
CITIZEN'S PRESENTATIONS (5 MINUTES MAXIMUM)
|
| |
|
1F
|
REPORTS OF OFFICIAL BOARDS
|
| |
|
1G
|
REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO BE HEARD AS PROVIDED IN RULE 6.06
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Chairman Gilbert III opened the reasonable opportunity for the public to speak.
The following persons appeared before the Board in opposition of Agenda Item 11A5:
City of Miramar Mayor Wayne Messam, 2300 Civic Center Place, Miramar, Florida, thanked Board members who had met with him and his team. He stated that the proposed 4,000-ton-per-day operation would pose a threat to Miramar residents, South Florida's water supply, and the Everglades. Mayor Messam noted that the Board's decision would be significant and questioned whether the Board would approve a recommendation that he characterized as not exploring reasonable waste management options. He noted that Miramar had not been included in discussions on the matter and referenced opposition from major environmental organizations to the Airport West site.
Florida House Representative Robin Bartleman, 16427 Sapphire Place, Weston, Florida, stated that the Board was considering placing an incinerator next to the Everglades. She noted that billions of dollars had been expended to restore the Everglades. Representative Bartleman stated that the Airport West site was adjacent to the Everglades and Broward County Water Preserve areas and fell within the footprints of the Biscayne Bay Southeastern Everglades Ecosystem Restoration Project. She stated that the site would affect the primary objectives of the Everglades Restoration projects. Representative Bartleman indicated that if the Board made this decision, she would address the matter in Tallahassee and asked that the Board reevaluate the Miami-Dade County Mayor's proposal.
Mr. Walter Butler, 18901 SW 63 Street, Southwest Ranches, Florida, stated that both the Airport West and newly proposed Okeechobee sites would affect the Everglades and residents of Southwest Broward, particularly Miramar. He stated that if the Board determined an incinerator was needed, it should be located in the middle of Miami-Dade County or at the original Doral site where it had been permitted.
Ms. Debbie Caroccio, 2602 SW 187 Terrace, Miramar, Florida, opposed the incinerator being built at the Opa-Locka Airport or Okeechobee locations.
Mr. Samuel Robinson, 3135 SW 140 Avenue, Miramar, Florida, requested that the Board delay the decision to obtain additional alternatives for consideration as part of research for the future incinerator site.
Mr. Ayoub "AJ" Mchatet, 4928 SW 168 Street, Miramar, Florida, stated that the Board should work on solutions that limit impacts on people, property, and plant life.
Mr. Alberto Salvi, 1318 SW 172 Terrace, Pembroke Pines, Florida, opposed the incinerator being located near the City of Miramar.
Ms. Judy Jawer, 3120 SW 187 Terrace, Miramar, Florida, questioned the criteria used for recommending the Opa-Locka Airport West site as a proposed location for the incinerator. She noted that the Opa-Locka Airport West facility site would cost more than the Doral site and take two years longer to build, which did not include costs for transporting waste for those two years, constructing the Doral Transfer facility, or potential lawsuits. Ms. Jawer noted that the facility would be located outside the Urban Development Boundary (UDB) line and asked that the Board collaborate with Broward County on a joint solution.
Mr. Nicholas Vermont, 3120 SW 187 Terrace, Miramar, Florida, opposed Agenda Items 11A5 and 14A5 and requested the Board consider alternative solutions to incineration.
Mr. David Navarrete, 378 SW 188 Terrace, Pembroke Pines, Florida, addressed the need for clean air and water. He asked that everyone work together and engage State and Federal legislators to enact legislation to protect the Everglades. He noted that air and water have no boundaries and that an incinerator affects the environment and residents.
Ms. Luz Mendez, 3160 SW 187 Terrace, Miramar, Florida, questioned whether the Board wanted to invest millions of dollars and years in litigation. She stated that the Board should invest in teamwork for sustainable solutions, such as a project team consisting of scientists, architects, engineers, and environmental researchers to determine best business practices.
Mr. Carson Edwards, 11969 SW 28 Court, Miramar, Florida, stated that the proposed incinerator project represented a threat to Miramar residents' health, environment, and quality of life. He requested the Board reject it and instead focus on sustainable waste management solutions such as recycling, composting, and waste reduction programs. Mr. Edwards stated these approaches create jobs, conserve resources, and protect the environment.
City of Miramar Commissioner Yvette Colbourne, 2300 Civic Center Place, Miramar, Florida, stated that the proposed incinerator near Miramar was not only a local issue but an environmental matter requiring consideration for all people. Commissioner Colbourne stated that a facility burning 4,000 tons of waste daily and releasing emissions into the air raised concerns. She referenced innovation versus incineration and requested the Board not accept the recommendation to build a waste-to-energy plant near residents' homes.
Mr. Bret Halbe, 17758 SW 36 Street, Miramar, Florida, noted that his wife and daughter had respiratory issues and expressed concerns about what an incinerator would mean for their health and the health of Miramar community members. He provided information about waste incineration processing and its potential effects on public health and the environment and asked the Board to explore alternative solutions.
Mr. Derek Hughes, 16418 SW 1 Street, Pembroke Pines, Florida, expressed concerns regarding health, safety, air, and water quality. He noted that the Board should consider impacts to both Broward and Miami-Dade County communities.
Mr. Jakub Martinek, 3310 SW 104 Terrace, Miramar, Florida, stated that the incinerator would pose threats to the environment and public health.
Mr. Francois Domond, Director of Utilities, City of Miramar, Utilities Department, 3551 SW 49 Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, addressed the Biscayne Bay Aquifer, which served as the primary groundwater source.
Mr. Raul Martinez, Jr., 777 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway, Sunrise, Florida, District Director for Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, conveyed that the Congresswoman advocated for consideration of another location with less impact on citizens' health and wellbeing. He stated the Congresswoman's position was that the incinerator should not move forward at Airport West or the Okeechobee sites. Mr. Martinez stated that the Congresswoman requested the Board revisit the sites before making a decision and undertake a comprehensive review of environmental assessments prior to issuing permits.
Ms. Alison Adams, 7211 Fairway Boulevard, Miramar, Florida, asked that the Board not place the incinerator in Miramar and not accept the recommendation to move the incinerator to the Airport West location.
Ms. Beyssa Buil, 7531 Miramar Parkway, Miramar, Florida, represented a coalition of people with disabilities and chronic illnesses. She stated that the incinerator would affect the rights of people living with diminished capacity for quality of life and asked that the Board research cleaner options.
Ms. Luz Schiestel, 2133 NW 208 Terrace, Pembroke Pines, Florida, requested the Board not vote on the matter for the proposed Airport West or newly proposed sites and asked that the Board consider impacts to the community and environment.
Ms. Maria Claudia Schubert-Fontes, 10063 Costa Del Sol Boulevard, Doral, Florida, with Catalyst Miami, stated that both Miami-Dade and Broward counties needed to build shared understanding to develop trust and involve community members and local organizations in the process. She noted the focus should be addressing concerns transparently and safeguarding collective health.
Mr. Marvin Todd, 15302 NW 3 Street, Pembroke Pines, Florida, requested the Board reconsider and seek a new solution for Broward County residents.
Mr. John Garate, 5901 SW 162 Avenue, Southwest Ranches, Florida, requested all parties work together with the funding required to build an incinerator that would not be in any community's vicinity.
Mr. Richard Ramcharitar, 5010 SW 166 Avenue, Southwest Ranches, Florida, stated that communities should refrain from introducing new incinerators and replace existing landfills and incinerators with zero waste policies and programs including extended producer responsibility (EPR), resource recovery parks, reuse, recycling, and composting facilities. He stated that it was important not to leave zero waste to waste experts alone, as many different skills needed to be deployed in the movement toward zero waste and sustainability. Mr. Ramcharitar stated that everyone had a role to play and all organizations, including non-governmental organizations, grassroots movements, businesses, and government entities that provide waste reduction, take-back, recycling, reuse, and composting services, should be involved to achieve zero waste. He requested that existing service providers be asked to adopt zero waste as a goal and seize opportunities to reduce waste and help communities and businesses achieve zero waste.
Mr. Ken Russell, 3142 Ohio Street, Coconut Grove, Florida, representing Sierra Club, stated that the organization did not favor an incinerator in the Everglades or elsewhere. He noted that Miami-Dade County was a leader on climate change issues. Mr. Russell referenced the Arcadis report commissioned by Miami-Dade County, specifically page 9, which stated that at the time of the report there was no large-scale commercial success with carbon dioxide capture and sequestration at waste-to-energy facilities.
Mr. Camilo Mejia, 3842 Frow Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida, referenced "Old Smokey" as a reminder of consequences related to emissions from incinerators, including respiratory disease, cancer, and environmental degradation. Mr. Mejia stated that there should be a shift toward waste reduction strategies that emphasize community education and participation, investing in composting and recycling, and supporting local food systems, which can create jobs, reduce pollution, and foster healthier environments. He noted this alternative approach would be transformative in its inclusion of community members in building a sustainable future.
Ms. Dinah Escarment, 808 NE 125 Street, Miami, Florida, opposed the Miami-Dade County Mayor's recommendation for Agenda Item 11A5.
Mr. Steven Leidner, 1130 102 Street, Bay Harbor Islands, Florida, opposed Agenda Item 11A5.
Ms. Gina Romero, 10909 NW 43 Lane, Doral, Florida, on behalf of Florida Rising in Miami, stated that everyone should have quality of life and water and expressed the need to stop the incinerator.
Mr. Noel Cleland, 5990 SW 50 Street, Miami, Florida, as a Sierra Club member, stated that the incinerator model was obsolete and that other cities had found alternative solutions.
Mr. Sebastian Caicedo, 400 NE 137 Street, North Miami, Florida, Regional Director for Florida Rising in Miami, stated that no community should have an incinerator built near it. He stated the Board should consider zero waste as an achievable goal for Miami-Dade County.
Ms. Catharina Bernabei, 1713 SW 103 Place, Miami, Florida, requested the Board seek alternative solutions.
Ms. Jasmine Thurston, 2450 SW 103 Way, Miramar, Florida, addressed potential effects on the environment and raised concerns about the local economy for all parties involved. She noted that this was not only a Miami-Dade County issue, as South Florida was interconnected between Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties through the economy, with tourism as a primary industry. Ms. Thurston stated that it would be beneficial to preserve the economy, environment, and health of the communities and asked the Board to act in the region's best interest.
Mr. Tobechuku Nwahiri, 17591 SW 41 Street, Miramar, Florida, questioned why, if the Board had time and money to litigate, it could not devote those resources to residents.
Mr. Mackenzie Marcelin, 10800 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, Florida Rising in Miami, noted that the location continued a history of environmental racism by placing facilities in communities of color. Mr. Marcelin stated that incinerators created a financial incentive to produce more waste by treating it as a resource to be burned rather than reduced or reused. He noted that contracts associated with incineration required the County to deliver a set amount of waste to incinerators, which contradicted zero waste principles. Mr. Marcelin stated this system created a cycle of continuously generating waste to justify the incinerator's existence. He noted that building an incinerator would result in decades of waste generation and effects on public health.
Ms. Dorothy Brown Alfaro, 14699 SW 47 Street, Miramar, Florida, noted that the City of Miramar already had the North Dade Landfill located on County Line Road in Miami Gardens and had been impacted by blasting in Miami-Dade. She asked the Board to seek different alternatives and locations and to vote against locating the incinerator at the proposed Airport West or Okeechobee Road sites.
Mr. Derrick Boakye, 10899 SW 4 Street, Miami, Florida, Florida Rising in Miami, asked the Board to reconsider the decision on incineration. He stated that having an incinerator in the community endangered residents and that action was needed to protect public health. Mr. Boakye asked the Board to consider future generations and public health.
Ms. Kerri-Ann Nesbeth, 2431 Dunhill Avenue, Miramar, Florida, stated that building the facility near homes posed health risks, particularly for children and pets. She noted that emissions released into the air and possibly water could affect families' long-term health and that there should be no compromise on air and water quality in Miramar. Ms. Nesbeth referenced "Old Smokey" in Coconut Grove and asked the Board to continue seeking alternative solutions.
Ms. Carline Paul, 601 Seacrest Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida, a Florida Rising member, opposed an incinerator being located at the Airport West site.
Ms. Res Martinez, 2700 Buttonwood Avenue, Miramar, Florida, opposed Agenda Item 11A5.
Mr. Jerry Estrada, 2265 SW 119 Avenue, Miramar, Florida, addressed the Everglades' fish, wildlife, and ecosystem, as well as natural resources such as air and water. He referenced the health of Florida residents and future generations and the impacts from an incinerator. He requested the Board seek another location.
Mr. John Guitar, 5548 SW 189 Avenue, Miramar, Florida, expressed the need to work together on this matter.
Mr. Alexander Hardemon, 775 NW 120 Street, Miami, Florida, opposed Agenda Item 11A5.
Mr. Juan Carlos Esquivel, 3725 Alcantara Avenue, Doral, Florida, noted that the meeting was to choose a suitable solid waste compost site.
City of Miramar Commissioner Maxwell Chambers expressed concern regarding air quality impacts from the incinerator.
Mr. Kelvin Baker, 16211 SW 16 Street, Miramar, Florida, addressed the site under consideration for the waste-to-energy facility. He noted that information provided by the City of Miramar was from local scientists and environmental professionals. Mr. Baker stated that ignoring the information provided could result in future concerns for those who voted on it. He stated there were health concerns related to long- and short-term effects on public health and the water supply. Mr. Baker requested the Board vote against Agenda Item 11A5.
City of West Park Commissioner Joy Smith, 4712 SW 25 Street, West Park, Florida, stated that the proposed alternative site was not preferable to the Airport West site. She asked the Board to consider impacts on future generations and questioned what legacy the Board desired to leave.
Mr. John Truitt, 301 South Bronough Street, Tallahassee, Florida, with GrayRobinson law firm representing the City of Doral, explained permitting difficulties and impossibilities associated with placing an incinerator in Doral.
Ms. Donna Hinds, 11050 SW 25 Street, Miramar, Florida, stated she opposed the incinerator and asked the Board to explore alternatives. She stated this was a significant decision and there was a need to invest in finding other waste management solutions. She referenced adopting a program to educate and inform residents to produce less trash and encouraged the Board to consider alternatives.
Ms. Rachel Prestipino, 300 NW 12 Avenue, Miami, Florida, representing Catalyst Miami, stated she did not support incineration anywhere. She stated there was a waste management challenge but that collective effort was needed to develop better solutions.
Ms. Patricia Aranda, 3057 SW 179 Avenue, Miramar, Florida, asked the Board to seek other solutions and noted the need for a clean environment.
Mr. Michael Rosenberg, 13030 North Calusa Club Drive, Miami, Florida, requested the Board return to the drawing board for future planning.
Mr. Michael Goldstein, 2700 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Coral Gables, Florida, counsel for the City of Miramar, noted that incinerators were the most expensive way to generate energy and far more expensive than landfilling. He stated that expensive incinerators had driven some local governments into bankruptcy, such as Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and Clermont, New Hampshire. Mr. Goldstein asked that the Board pause the process and review zero waste strategies to reduce the volume of waste in the system so there would be no need for incinerators.
Mr. Albert Gomez, 3566 Vista Court and 2250 NW 102 Avenue, Doral, Florida, expressed opposition toward the incinerator and incineration in general. He stated that this was not a circular waste stream because it transferred mercury and dioxins into the air and, based on the water cycle, into the Everglades and northern wellfields. He stated that no level of cancer-causing mercury and dioxins entering the environment was acceptable. Mr. Gomez noted the rejection of incineration across the county and country, with two main incinerator clusters in the northeast and Florida. He stated that costs were based on State financial incentives attempting to defray project costs. Mr. Gomez noted misrepresentation of costs between trucking versus rail with an interim landfill solution in central Florida and omission of costs including toxic ash pollution. He asked the Board to consider Doral's landfill and its carbon emissions.
Mr. Luis Barrios, 5441 SW 185 Street, Miramar, Florida, noted the proposed Airport West site's proximity to a cemetery, his residence (less than two miles), a hospital (four miles), and a school (two miles).
Ms. Natzul Bianco, 18748 SW 28 Street, Miramar, Florida, stated that building an incinerator would affect people and natural resources. She stated an incinerator would affect air and water quality and the Everglades ecosystem.
Ms. Mary Waters, 13600 SW 229 Street, Miami, Florida, stated the Board should further review the incinerator concept and that she did not support any of the four proposed sites.
Mr. Z Spicer, 545 NE 169 Terrace, Miami, Florida, stated that waste-to-energy was not a viable solution and that negative impacts outweighed benefits. He requested the Board return to the drawing board.
City of Pembroke Pines Mayor Angelo Castillo, 601 City Center Way, Pembroke Pines, Florida, requested the Board not place the proposed facility anywhere. He stated that other waste disposal methods existed. Mayor Castellano noted impacts to residents and that the proposed locations would make the project environmentally and financially unfeasible. He stated that the City of Pembroke Pines opposed the incinerator and noted that Broward County rejected incineration as inconsistent with the quality of life for southwest Broward or Miami-Dade.
Ms. Selma Garcia, 6306 NW 105 Place, Doral, Florida, stated that the Board faced a difficult decision on where to develop a sustainable waste management campus. She stated the facility would need sufficient space to accommodate sustainable management processes, particularly for the Airport West proposed site. Ms. Garcia encouraged the Board to consider the magnitude of the decision and stated that the best option was not incineration.
Mr. Xavier Esteve, 17436 SW 33 Court, Miramar, Florida, a City of Miramar Utilities Department employee, noted his role in treating and maintaining the City of Miramar's drinking water, which came from the Biscayne Aquifer. He stated he did not support incineration.
Ms. Michelle Drucker, 1101 Palermo Avenue, Coral Gables, Florida, noted she represented approximately 30,000 Parent Teacher Association (PTA) members who voted to commit to 100% clean energy in 2021. She noted the PTA drafted a report on how the school district could save $100 million, which included composting and recycling efforts.
Mr. Philip Stoddard, 6820 SW 64 Court, South Miami, Florida, addressed the issues of having an incinerator and not building one anywhere. He stated the County had alternatives if the Board desired to reduce waste volume.
Mr. Ali Sylvestre, 2706 Alcazar Drive, Miramar, Florida, opposed an incinerator being built in his vicinity. He requested the Board reconsider and review other alternatives and better solutions. Mr. Sylvestre stated that every family deserved clean water and air.
Ms. Amanda Di Perna, 11900 SW 188 Street, Miami, Florida, representing Debris Free Oceans (DFO), a local nonprofit organization, stated that the County's current system could not handle the waste generated by the County. She noted that building an incinerator would perpetuate production and consumption at an unsustainable rate. Ms. Di Perna stated there must be a shift to zero waste solutions like reuse and refill, which were occurring in cities across the United States and globally. She noted receipt of federal funding to support Zero Waste Miami, a coalition working to build a circular economy in Miami-Dade County. Ms. Di Perna noted there were over 100 DFO members representing over 75 entities planning to spend the next two years listening and learning from the community to create zero waste strategies. She stated the need for additional time to determine alternative solutions that work for everyone and requested investment in solutions that prevent waste rather than burn it.
Ms. Madeline Kaufman, 2508 SW 19 Terrace, Program and Outreach Director, Debris Free Oceans, requested the Board invest in solutions that prevent waste rather than incinerator infrastructure. She stated that incinerators required waste to operate efficiently and were part of a linear economy dependent on continued waste extraction for disposal and burning of materials. Ms. Kaufman stated that switching to reusable services saved small businesses up to $22,000 per year and eliminated up to a quarter million pieces of waste per business per year. She noted this could prevent over 18 billion waste items per year from Miami's 82,000 small businesses. Ms. Kaufman noted the passage of reuse mandates in multiple cities and stated there was a growing service industry where new companies provided sanitized, returned, redistributed, and reusable materials.
Ms. Ana Vale, 10365 NW 66 Street, Doral, Florida, appeared with her family and her husband Edwin Vale and opposed an incinerator.
Ms. Elisha Moultrie, 9057 SW 19 Street, Miramar, Florida, stated that placing one city's quality of life above another represented environmental and racial injustice. She stated that air and water quality were civil rights. Ms. Moultrie noted that historically, communities of color had been impacted by toxic facilities near cities affecting health and wellbeing. She stated that basic principles dictated containing and cleaning up contamination rather than spreading it. Ms. Moultrie stated that as a civil rights advocate for environmental justice, the NAACP opposed incinerators diminishing historic lands such as the Opa-Locka Airport West site located near burial grounds, the Everglades, and surrounding cities. She asked whether her quality of life mattered and stated the Board's vote would answer that question.
Ms. Francesca DiJulio, 100 NW 6 Street, Miami, Florida, Staff Attorney with Everglades Law Center, Inc., a nonprofit law firm dedicated to protecting South Florida ecosystems, requested the Board thoroughly consider the proposed waste-to-energy facility and its impact on the environment, especially Everglades restoration. Ms. DiJulio stated that the two sites, including the County Mayor's recommended site, were adjacent to canals necessary for Everglades and Biscayne Bay restoration. She noted the sites were part of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) component and that siting the incinerator facility and CERP projects raised issues for planning, development, and location. She noted that applications for development outside the UDB found inconsistent with CERP objectives should be denied.
Ms. Nicole Gazo, 3400 SW 27 Avenue, Miramar, Florida, reiterated opposition to the incinerator.
Ms. Angela Messam, 18961 SW 30 Street, opposed the incinerator.
The following speakers appeared in support of Agenda Item 11A5:
Mr. Joe Kilsheimer, 37 North Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida, Executive Director for the Florida Waste-to-Energy Coalition, provided an overview of the Coalition's purpose and membership. He stated that waste-to-energy was critical infrastructure for Miami-Dade County and the State of Florida and provided an explanation of waste-to-energy to the Board.
Mr. Cesar Abarca, 10460 NW 69 Street, Miami, Florida, noted that the matter concerned a holistic solid waste management system that enabled collection and disposal of waste in a manner that was sustainable operationally, financially, and environmentally.
City of Doral Councilman Rafael Pineyro, 8401 NW 53 Terrace, Doral, Florida, requested the Board support relocation of the waste-to-energy facility as proposed by Miami-Dade Mayor Levine Cava. He stated this would ensure a cleaner, healthier environment for all residents and that working together would lead to a safer and more sustainable future for Miami-Dade County residents.
Ms. Sui Jim, 6327 NW 104 Path, Doral, Florida, stated that after reviewing the Arcadis Report, she suggested the following: (1) if the Board chose Airport West because it had 416 acres, then the Board should sell the Doral site and use those funds to buy the Medley site to build the transfer station, or (2) build the incinerator at the Medley site because it had 328 acres, eliminating the need to build a transfer station. She stated that residents did not want either the incinerator or transfer station in Doral.
Mr. Jorge Mejia, 10920 NW 69 Street, Doral, Florida, identified himself as an environmental engineer with over 30 years of experience. He stated that according to the Arcadis report, prevailing winds in South Florida came from the southeast, meaning pollutants from incinerators would move mostly toward the northwest. Mr. Mejia noted the Arcadis report contained results of preliminary screening of health risks to populations around the proposed sites. He stated the risk of non-cancer conditions such as cardiovascular disease from particulates would be three in 100 for some sites and less than one in 100 for residents near the Airport West site. He noted that 40 percent of Doral's population lived in the northwest area, which could result in several hundred cases.
Mr. Thomas Eriksen, 9910 NW 47 Terrace, Doral, Florida, noted his experience in the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of waste-to-energy facilities for over 35 years in both the United States and Europe. He stated a modern waste-to-energy facility was safe, clean, and an environmentally sound waste disposal solution. Mr. Eriksen noted that external odors and noise were minimal, but due to the facility's size, there would be additional delivery trucks on the roadways. He noted the impact would include approximately a three-year construction schedule and additional consideration of noise, emissions, and traffic in the city. Mr. Eriksen noted the Arcadis Report referenced innovative waste treatment processes for a solid waste campus and that one or more of these processes would ultimately be included in the new sustainable solid waste facility outside of Doral.
Mr. Anthony Cabrera, 11461 Lakeside Drive, Doral, Florida, addressed the impacts of an incinerator. He noted the current incinerator with its 40-year-old technology continued to affect air quality and daily wellbeing, especially in Commission District 12. Mr. Cabrera thanked elected officials for their work in advocating to remove the current facility. He stated that while relocating the incinerator might not be the best political position, consideration should be given to the hundreds of families and schools affected by emissions. Mr. Cabrera requested the Board make a decision to relocate the incinerator for the community.
Ms. Ivette Gonzalez Petkovich, 10352 NW 46 Terrace, Doral, Florida, noted that the Board faced a difficult decision regarding a new location for the incinerator that would directly affect residents.
Ms. Roxanna Garay, 8169 NW 48 Terrace, Doral, Florida, stated that collectively, everyone should work together to obtain a solution for zero waste and eliminate old technologies.
Mr. Lorenzo Cobiella, 8102 NW 155 Street, City Attorney for the City of Doral, stated that the City of Doral took responsibility for protecting the city and Doral residents. He stated it was the city's expectation that the County would accept Miami-Dade County's recommendation to place the facility at the Airport West proposed site. Mr. Cobiella stated that the City of Doral and the County would work on a long-term agreement that would be beneficial for all residents, who were also City of Doral residents.
Mr. Raul Gastesi, 8105 NW 155 Street, Miami Lakes, Florida, City Attorney for the City of Doral, noted that the Board's constituents were the residents of Miami-Dade County, Florida. He stated that the Airport West site was more beneficial to and for the County's constituents.
Mr. Gary Carman, 1541 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, GrayRobinson P.A., Special Counsel for the City of Doral, thanked the Board for the opportunity to speak. He stated that the City of Doral supported the County Mayor's proposal and asked that Board members support the County Mayor's recommendation.
Ms. Stephanie Carman, 333 SE 2 Street, Suite 3200, Miami, Florida, attorney with GrayRobinson, Special Counsel for the City of Doral, supported Agenda Item 11A5 and the Airport West site for the new proposed facility.
City of Doral Mayor Christi Fraga, 8401 NW 53 Terrace, Doral, Florida, supported Agenda Item 11A5 and noted the decision was not an easy one. She stated that the City of Doral had lived with the incinerator for many years.
The following speaker appeared on Agenda Item 8F2:
Chaplin Stanley Young, 500 NW 2 Avenue, Miami, Florida stated there were approximately 4,790 people in Miami-Dade County jail requiring attention. Chaplin Young stated that approximately 4,208 of the inmates were felons who needed dedicated public housing to continue development toward a better quality of life. He stated his willingness to assist the County with this community matter.
Seeing no one else appear wishing to speak, Vice Chairman Rodriguez closed the reasonable opportunity to be heard.
|
|
|
1H
|
MOTION TO SET THE AGENDA AND "PULL LIST"
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan noted the following changes including pull list and co-sponsorship requests:
- Senator Garcia and Commissioner Cohen Higgins requested Agenda Item 8F2 and its substitute be added to the Pull List;
- Commissioner Gonzalez requested Agenda Item 8K1 be added to the Pull List;
- Commissioner Higgins requested Agenda Item 8P2 be added to the Pull List;
- Commissioners Cabrera and Regalado requested Agenda Item 8P4 be added to the Pull List;
- Senator Garcia and Commissioner Cohen Higgins requested Agenda Item 11A2 be added to the Pull List;
- Commissioner Regalado requested Agenda Item 11A3 be added to the Pull List for an amendment and released it after County Attorney Bonzon-Keenan read the proposed amendment into the record;
- Senator Garcia and Commissioner Cohen Higgins requested Agenda Item 11A5 be added to the Pull List;
- Commissioner Cohen Higgins requested Agenda Item 11A6 be added to the Pull List; however, the sponsor requested a deferral to no date certain.
Chairman Gilbert III stated that the item would be deferred as requested
- Senator Garcia requested Agenda Item 14A3 be added to the Pull List; and
- Commissioner Higgins requested Agenda Item 15B1 be added to the Pull List
- Commissioner Regalado requested to assume sponsorship of Agenda Items 3B1 and 3B2
- Senator Garcia requested to be listed as a co-sponsor on Agenda Items 4A, 5E, 11A1, 11A3, 11A4, and 14A9
- Commissioner Cabrera requested to assume sponsorship of Agenda Item 8K1
- Commissioner McGhee requested to be listed as a co-sponsor on Agenda Item 11A1
- Commissioner Gonzalez requested to be listed as a co-sponsor on Agenda Item 11A2
- Commissioners Higgins, Cabrera, and Senator Garcia requested to be listed as co-sponsors on Agenda Item 14A7
- Commissioners Higgins, Bastien, and Senator Garcia requested to be listed as co-sponsors on Agenda Item 14A8
- Commissioner Steinberg requested to be listed as a co-sponsor on Agenda Items 14A6, 14A7, and 14A8
CA Bonzon-Keenan stated the items to be considered at today�s Board meeting would be those listed in the printed final agenda, with the additions, deferrals, withdrawals and scrivener�s errors noted in Chairman Gilbert�s III memorandum, and the aforementioned items. She added the Commission would approve all of those items by a single vote setting the agenda except for Agenda Item 2B1, ordinances for first reading; public hearing items; ordinances set for second reading; Agenda Items 8P5 and 14A1, which must be voted on separately pursuant to Florida Statute; and the following �Pull List� agenda items: 8F2, 8K1, 8P2, 11A2, 11A5, 14A1, 14A2, 14A3, 14A4, 14A5, 14A6 and its Supplement, 14A7, 14A8, 14A9, 14A10, 14A11, 14B1 and 15B1.
Commissioner Bastien moved that the Board approve today�s agenda, along with the changes noted in Chairman Gilbert�s III Changes Memorandum dated September 17, 2024, and the additional changes noted by CA Bonzon-Keenan. This motion was seconded by Senator Garcia, and upon being put to a vote, passed 13-0.
|
|
|
1I
|
OFFICE OF COMMISSION AUDITOR
|
| |
|
1J
|
OFFICE OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
|
| |
|
1K
|
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ADVOCACY
|
| |
|
1L
|
OFFICE OF POLICY AND BUDGETARY AFFAIRS
|
| |
|
2
|
MAYORAL ISSUES
|
| |
|
2A
|
MAYORAL VETOES
|
| |
|
2B
|
MAYORAL REPORTS
|
| |
|
2B1
|
|
| |
241684
|
Report
|
|
| |
|
| |
MAYORAL APPOINTMENT - DIRECTOR OF THE INTERNAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT(Mayor)
|
Accepted
Report
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
Miami-Dade Mayor Levine Cava introduced Mr. Raymond Hall, as the newly appointed as Director of the Miami-Dade County Internal Services Department (ISD).
Mr. Hall expressed gratitude and that he looked forward to working with Mayor Levine Cava and the Board members.
|
|
|
2C
|
OTHER ISSUES
|
| |
|
3
|
CONSENT ITEMS
|
| |
|
3A
|
COMMISSIONER CONSENT ITEMS
|
| |
|
3A1
|
|
| |
241631
|
Resolution
 Clerk's Official Copy
|
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 4 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE
|
Adopted
Resolution R-789-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A2
|
|
| |
241629
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Marleine Bastien
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION RESCINDING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 2 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE
|
Adopted
Resolution R-790-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A3
|
|
| |
241638
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Juan Carlos Bermudez
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 12 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE
|
Adopted
Resolution R-791-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A4
|
|
| |
241630
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Kevin Marino Cabrera
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 6 CBO DISCRETIONARY RESERVE
|
Adopted
Resolution R-792-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A5
|
|
| |
241639
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Sen. Rene Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 13 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE, FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 13 ARENA NAMING RIGHTS FUND AND WAIVING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. R-238-21 AS RELATED TO THE ALLOCATIONS FROM THE ARENA NAMING RIGHTS FUND
|
Adopted
Resolution R-793-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A6
|
|
| |
241627
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 1 DESIGNATED PROJECT PROGRAM; RESCINDING AN ALLOCATION FROM THE FY 2022-23 AND FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 1 DESIGNATED PROJECT PROGRAM; AND APPROVING AN ALLOCATION FROM THE NON-DEPARTMENTAL ALLOCATION FROM FY 2022-23 AND FY 2023-24 JUNETEENTH EVENTS
|
Adopted
Resolution R-794-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A7
|
|
| |
241637
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Roberto J. Gonzalez
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 11 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE
|
Adopted
Resolution R-795-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A8
|
|
| |
241632
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Eileen Higgins
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 5 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE AND FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 5 DESIGNATED PROGRAM
|
Adopted
Resolution R-796-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A9
|
|
| |
241634
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Kionne L. McGhee
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ALLOCATION FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 9 DESIGNATED PROJECT PROGRAM AND AN ALLOCATION FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 9 OFFICE FUNDS
|
Adopted
Resolution R-797-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A10
|
|
| |
241633
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Raquel A. Regalado
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ALLOCATION FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 7 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE AND RESCINDING AN ALLOCATION FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 7 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE
|
Adopted
Resolution R-798-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3A11
|
|
| |
241635
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Anthony Rodriguez
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FY 2023-24 DISTRICT 10 DISCRETIONARY RESERVE
|
Adopted
Resolution R-799-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3B
|
DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT ITEMS
|
| |
|
3B1
|
|
| |
241517
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Raquel A. Regalado
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION RETROACTIVELY APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RESILIENT FLORIDA GRANT PROGRAM FOR $807,975.00 SUPPORTING THE NORTH AND SOUTH SEAWALL REPLACEMENT AT CRANDON PARK MARINA; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND FUNDS AND EXECUTE CONTRACTS, AMENDMENTS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE GRANT(Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-800-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3B2
|
|
| |
241528
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Raquel A. Regalado
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION RETROACTIVELY APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES FOR $50,000.00 FUNDED IN PART WITH FRIENDS OF METRO-DADE PARKS TRUST FUNDS SUPPORTING THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT FOR PHASE II TOWERS AND WALL AT CORAL GABLES WAYSIDE PARK; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND FUNDS AND EXECUTE CONTRACTS, AMENDMENTS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT(Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-801-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3B3
|
|
| |
241527
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION RATIFYING EMERGENCY CONTRACT NO. 268645 WITH TPG PRESSURE, INC. DBA THOMPSON PIPE GROUP PRESSURE FOR REPAIR OF 96-INCH RAW WATER MAIN PIPE ALONG NW 74TH STREET IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $553,978.90 FOR A FOUR-MONTH TERM FOR THE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT, INCLUDING ANY CANCELLATION OR EXTENSIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1 OF THE COUNTY CODE AND IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-38(Strategic Procurement)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-802-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
3B4
|
|
| |
241540
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO ACCEPT AND EXECUTE A LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO PROVIDE THE COUNTY WITH $134,009.00 IN SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM FUNDS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 2-9 AND 2-10 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE SUCH CONTRACTS, AGREEMENTS, MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING, AND AMENDMENTS AS REQUIRED BY LAP GUIDELINES OR TO FURTHER THE PURPOSES DESCRIBED IN THE FUNDING REQUESTS FOLLOWING APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY�S OFFICE AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY AMENDMENT, MODIFICATIONS, RENEWALS, EXTENSIONS, CANCELLATIONS AND TERMINATION PROVISIONS; AND TO APPLY FOR, RECEIVE AND EXPEND ADDITIONAL FUNDS(Transportation and Public Works)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-803-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
4
|
ORDINANCES FOR FIRST READING
|
| |
|
4A
|
|
| |
241600
|
Ordinance
|
Keon Hardemon
Sen. Rene Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; AMENDING SECTION 2-1 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; REVISING PROVISIONS RELATED TO ORDINANCES DIRECTLY AFFECTING MUNICIPALITIES; PROVIDING FOR PRIORITY NOTIFICATION TO MUNICIPALITIES WHEN SUCH ORDINANCES ARE TO BE HEARD ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Adopted on first reading
Public Hearing:
October 7, 2024
Ordinance 24-126
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Marleine Bastien
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed ordinance into the record.
The foregoing proposed ordinance was adopted on first reading and set for public hearing before the Chairman's Policy Council and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee meeting on October 7, 2024 at 9:00 a.m.
|
|
|
4B
|
|
| |
241506
|
Ordinance
|
Sen. Rene Garcia
Kionne L. McGhee
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY HIV/AIDS PARTNERSHIP; AMENDING SECTIONS 2-1102 AND 2-1103 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; REVISING MEMBERSHIP, ORGANIZATION, AND QUORUM REQUIREMENTS; MAKING TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING CHANGES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE(Office of Management and Budget)
|
Adopted on first reading
Public Hearing:
October 7, 2024
Ordinance 24-127
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Marleine Bastien
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed ordinance into the record.
The foregoing proposed ordinance was adopted on first reading and set for public hearing before the Community Health Committee on October 7, 2024 at 12:00 p.m.
|
|
|
4C
|
|
| |
241485
|
Ordinance
|
|
| |
|
| |
ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, GENERALLY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY SW 305 STREET, ON THE EAST BY SW 188 COURT, ON THE SOUTH BY THEORETICAL SW 306 STREET, AND ON THE WEST BY SW 189 AVENUE, KNOWN AND DESCRIBED AS REDLAND GARDENS SOUTH STREET LIGHTING SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; IDENTIFYING SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO PROVIDE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREETLIGHTS; APPROVING A STREET LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH HOMESTEAD ENERGY SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; WAIVING PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. R-130-06; AND PROVIDING FOR EXCLUSION FROM THE CODE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE(Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces)
|
Deferred
to
October 1, 2024
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
During the consideration of the motion to set the agenda, the Board deferred the foregoing proposed ordinance to the October 1, 2024, Board meeting.
|
|
|
4D
|
|
| |
241488
|
Ordinance
|
|
| |
|
| |
ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, GENERALLY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY NW 41 STREET, ON THE EAST BY NW 107 AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY THEORETICAL NW 33 TERRACE, AND ON THE WEST BY NW 112 AVENUE, KNOWN AND DESCRIBED AS BRIDGE DORAL STREET LIGHTING SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; IDENTIFYING SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED; AND PROVIDING FOR EXCLUSION FROM THE CODE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE(Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces)
|
Adopted on first reading
Public Hearing:
October 16, 2024
Ordinance 24-114
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Marleine Bastien
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed ordinance into the record.
The foregoing proposed ordinance was adopted on first reading and set for public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on October 16, 2024 at 9:30 a.m.
|
|
|
4E
|
|
| |
241601
|
Ordinance
|
|
| |
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO MIAMI-DADE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN; PROVIDING DISPOSITION OF APPLICATION NO. CDMP20230026, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SW 232 STREET AND SW 112 AVENUE, FILED BY LENNAR HOMES, LLC., AS AN OCTOBER 2023 CYCLE APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COUNTY�S COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, EXCLUSION FROM THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE [SEE AGENDA ITEM NO. 8C2](Regulatory and Economic Resources)
|
Adopted on first reading
Public Hearing:
No Date Certain
Ordinance 25-33
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Marleine Bastien
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed ordinance into the record.
The foreging proposed ordinance was adopted on first reading and will be advertised in accordance with Section 2-116.1 of the Code of Miami-Dade County.
|
|
|
5
|
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Scheduled for 9:30 a.m.)
|
| |
|
5A
|
|
| |
241376
|
Resolution
|
Marleine Bastien
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DECLARING AS SURPLUS A COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2750 NW 20TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA (FOLIO NO. 01-3133-007-0040) (�PROPERTY�); REVISING THE INVENTORY LIST OF REAL PROPERTIES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 125.379, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO INCLUDE THE PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE FULL BOARD MEMBERSHIP THE CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY TO GOLDSTEIN KITE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC OR ITS AFFILIATE 1960 NW 27TH AVE LLC (�DEVELOPER�), FOR A NOMINAL AMOUNT, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 125.379, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND SECTION 2-8.6.5 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRPERSON OR VICE-CHAIRPERSON TO EXECUTE THE COUNTY DEED; DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXPEDITIOUSLY CONDUCT ALL DUE DILIGENCE REVIEWS PRIOR TO THE CHAIRPERSON OR VICE-CHAIRPERSON EXECUTING THE COUNTY DEED; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE SAME, AND TO EXERCISE ANY AND ALL RIGHTS SET FORTH IN THE COUNTY DEED; REQUIRING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT A REPORT IF THE CONVEYANCE CANNOT BE EFFECTUATED; AND WAIVING THE REQUIREMENT OF IMPLEMENTING ORDER 8-4 REQUIRING THE COUNTY DEED TO BE EXECUTED BY NON-COUNTY PARTIES PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION BY THE BOARD [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 241126]
|
Amended
|
| |
REPORT:
See Agenda Item 5A Amended, Legislative File Number 241789 for the amended version.
|
|
| |
7/8/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with favorable recommendation with committee amendments by the Housing, Recreation, Culture & Community Dev. Cmte
|
|
| |
7/16/2024
Deferred by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
|
5A AMENDED
|
|
| |
241789
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Marleine Bastien
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DECLARING AS SURPLUS A COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2750 NW 20TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA (FOLIO NO. 01-3133-007-0040) (�PROPERTY�); REVISING THE INVENTORY LIST OF REAL PROPERTIES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 125.379, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO INCLUDE THE PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE FULL BOARD MEMBERSHIP THE CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY TO GOLDSTEIN KITE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC OR ITS AFFILIATE 1960 NW 27TH AVE LLC (�DEVELOPER�), FOR A NOMINAL AMOUNT, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 125.379, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND SECTION 2-8.6.5 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRPERSON OR VICE-CHAIRPERSON TO EXECUTE THE COUNTY DEED; DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXPEDITIOUSLY CONDUCT ALL DUE DILIGENCE REVIEWS PRIOR TO THE CHAIRPERSON OR VICE-CHAIRPERSON EXECUTING THE COUNTY DEED; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE SAME, AND TO EXERCISE ANY AND ALL RIGHTS SET FORTH IN THE COUNTY DEED; REQUIRING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT A REPORT IF THE CONVEYANCE CANNOT BE EFFECTUATED; AND WAIVING THE REQUIREMENT OF IMPLEMENTING ORDER 8-4 REQUIRING THE COUNTY DEED TO BE EXECUTED BY NON-COUNTY PARTIES PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION BY THE BOARD [SEE ORIGINAL ITEMS UNDER FILE NOS. 241376, 241126]
|
Adopted as amended
Resolution R-804-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Kevin Marino Cabrera
Vote: 12 - 1
No: Steinberg
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed resolution.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the public hearing.
Mr. Miguel de la Portilla appeared in support of the foregoing proposed resolution and Commissioner Bastien�s vision for the subject property outlined in the resolution.
Chairman Gilbert III closed the public hearing after no one else appeared wishing to speak.
Commissioner Bastien presented a resolution to convey County-owned property located at 2750 Northwest 20th Street to facilitate affordable housing development. She explained that negotiations had been ongoing for over a year and emphasized the urgency of addressing the housing crisis. Commissioner Bastien reported the developer committed to allocating 10 percent of housing units for extremely low-income households earning 30 percent of area median income (AMI), 15 percent for low- to moderate-income households earning 60 to 100 percent AMI, and 25 percent for workforce housing serving households up to 120 percent AMI. She referenced data from the Housing Committee indicating that by 2030, the County would need approximately 35,000 housing units for households between 81 and 120 percent AMI, and 115,000 units for households below 80 percent AMI.
Commissioner Bastien stated that the resolution would authorize the Mayor to negotiate with the developer to preserve boat ramp access for public safety departments and potentially provide space for a mobile command unit for police and fire operations. She noted that she had been committed to accommodating public safety needs from the outset. Commissioner Bastien referenced an alternative property at 1175 Northwest South River Drive that could potentially meet some administrative needs. She expressed frustration with what she characterized as conflicting administrative requests, specifically citing demands to accommodate dump trucks, flatbed trucks, and cranes for waste disposal operations, which she stated were inappropriate for a residential development site and represented a pattern of placing undesirable facilities in communities of color.
Commissioner Gonzalez expressed support for the project while noting serious concerns about the process. He stated that the Internal Services Department (ISD) had a new director and that improved interdepartmental coordination was essential. Commissioner Gonzalez noted that ISD had failed to consult Commissioner McGhee about a project affecting a building where Commissioner McGhee maintained a district office. He emphasized that departments should inform all commissioners and other County departments before proceeding with surplus property proposals. Commissioner Gonzalez described the project as a legacy development that would enable Miami-Dade County residents to remain in the community. He noted that a forthcoming report would clarify the property's significance for various uses.
Commissioner Bermudez requested clarification regarding the applicant's identity.
Mr. Miguel Diaz de la Portilla, representing the developer, identified Goldstein Kite Environmental, LLC (GKE) as the entity that had worked with Commissioner Bastien's office throughout the process. He stated that an affiliated entity, 1960 Northwest 27th Avenue, LLC, owned adjacent property abutting the County-owned site, which was contaminated brownfield land.
Commissioner Gonzalez questioned Chief Jadallah regarding current emergency response times on the river.
Chief Jadallah responded that response times from the Port of Miami to the subject area averaged approximately 90 minutes. He explained that the extended duration resulted from no-wake zone restrictions requiring idle speed navigation and the need to wait for two drawbridge openings to accommodate the Department's large vessels.
Commissioner Gonzalez asked why the Department was not currently utilizing the subject property.
Chief Jadallah explained that the Department had learned earlier in the year that the land had become available. However, upon investigating, the Department discovered that housing development discussions were already underway. He noted that the property had been divided into two segments, with one portion used by a contractor until the previous year, while the segment containing the boat ramp had remained largely vacant with some supply storage.
Commissioner Gonzalez asked Mr. Diaz de la Portilla whether any County department had communicated public safety needs for the property during the 18-month negotiation period.
Mr. Diaz de la Portilla responded that concerns and requests from police and fire departments first emerged at a Housing Committee meeting in June. He stated at that meeting, his client committed to providing continued boat ramp access to police and fire departments, neither of which had previously used the facility despite the County owning the property for 30 years.
Commissioner Gonzalez asked Chief Jadallah whether the Department's non-use of the property resulted from lack of awareness that it was available.
Chief Jadallah confirmed that the property had been divided into segments and that until recently, the Department had not known the boat ramp portion was accessible for their operations.
In response to Commissioner Gonzalez�s question about the Department's vessel inventory, Chief Jadallah responded that Miami-Dade Fire Rescue operated three 55-foot boats, two 38-foot fireboats, and inflatable boats, totaling seven vessels.
Lieutenant Michael Barrios reminded commissioners that they had previously supported adding four officers to the unit to address increased illicit activity on the waterways following the COVID-19 pandemic. He stated that the Department would be receiving and stationing a vessel at the location during the upcoming year. Lieutenant Barrios noted that in the interim, the Marine Patrol Unit had been utilizing vessels from other marinas for operations in the area.
Commissioner Gonzalez asked why this specific location was necessary for public safety when another property existed in close proximity.
Chief Jadallah responded that the subject property contained an existing boat ramp, which he described as highly valuable. He explained that the alternative property at 1175 Northwest South River Drive lacked a boat ramp. Chief Jadallah stated that the Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency had prohibited construction of new boat ramps on the Miami River, meaning all existing ramps were grandfathered under current regulations and could not be replicated. He noted that the Department had inquired about the 1175 property in 2021 but was informed it was designated for affordable housing in the future. Chief Jadallah emphasized that both police and fire departments had been searching for suitable waterfront property for years without success, and the subject property only came to their attention through an email notification.
Commissioner Gonzalez clarified that the discussion involved more than simply parking boats on the water. He emphasized that departments needed ramp access to remove vessels from the water for regular maintenance and servicing. Commissioner Gonzalez asked why vessels needed to be removed from the water.
Chief Jadallah explained that the maintenance process was similar to the air rescue helicopter program with the Department's 55-foot boats requiring servicing approximately every 200 hours of operation. He stated the process required a travel lift system and once lifted, boats were moved onto land where maintenance work was performed. Chief Jadallah explained that the Department maintained a rotation system with two 55-foot boats operational on the water while one underwent maintenance, similar to the air rescue helicopter rotation schedule. He emphasized that the ramp was the only feasible method for removing the large vessels from the water.
Commissioner Gonzalez sought confirmation that even if the 1175 location became available, Army Corps of Engineers restrictions would prohibit boat ramp construction at that site. He stated that the purpose of securing the subject property was to enable boat servicing, ensuring vessels remained operational and safe for public safety officers conducting rescue operations.
Chief Jadallah confirmed this understanding and added important information about hurricane preparedness. He explained that during hurricane events, Fire Rescue was required to move vessels as far south as Ocean Reef and as far north as Pompano Beach and Fort Lauderdale. The Department lacked a dedicated site to load boats and required floating dock facilities due to vessel sizes. Chief Jadallah stated that having dedicated ramp facilities would reduce out-of-service time from 36-48 hours to approximately 2-3 hours. He noted that whenever the U.S. Coast Guard issued no-vessel orders due to storms, Fire Rescue vessels were typically already secured 24-36 hours in advance. Chief Jadallah emphasized that the property represented a critical component ensuring continued public safety operations and acknowledged that while mistakes had occurred in the process, the Department needed to ensure this parcel was not lost given the difficulty of replicating its characteristics.
Commissioner Gonzalez asked whether any discussions had occurred about the property's importance for public safety during the negotiation period.
Mr. Michael Goldstein, representing the applicant, stated that no such conversations had taken place.
Commissioner Gonzalez expressed frustration that the district commissioner had negotiated for 18 months to bring residents an opportunity to live on the river with affordable and workforce housing during a housing crisis, yet departments had not communicated with each other during this entire period. He noted that the developer had invested substantial time working on the proposal and had met with Fire Rescue and the Administration seeking resolution. Commissioner Gonzalez stated that the developer had been presented with an extensive list of demands from three departments�Police, Fire, and the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources�in addition to the affordable and workforce housing requirements. He expressed concern that this was not the final request and that there would be no opportunity to negotiate because the comprehensive report analyzing the property would not be available for 30 days.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that the report would be finalized within a few days rather than 30 days, which was why she believed a deferral would be appropriate. She noted that the report would address all the issues Commissioner Gonzalez had raised. Mayor Levine Cava explained that the Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW) held the property in its portfolio. She stated that as early as spring 2023, DTPW had informed the Internal Services Department that the property was not surplus and remained in active use. Mayor Levine Cava indicated she had reason to believe others were aware of this information, yet ISD continued negotiating with the district commissioner and developers, and this critical information did not emerge until one year later.
Chief Jadallah stated that Commissioner Bastien had directed police and fire departments to discuss their operational needs with the developer. He confirmed that staff from both departments had met with Mr. Diaz de la Portilla to outline departmental requirements. Chief Jadallah indicated that during those discussions, the developer stated they could not accommodate Fire Rescue's needs.
Mr. Diaz de la Portilla provided clarification on the scope and timeline of discussions with County departments. He explained that following the committee meeting, the Board's initial directive was to accommodate boat ramp access for both police and fire departments, to which the developer agreed without objection. Subsequently, the developer was asked to provide five to six parking spaces for a mobile crime unit, which was also agreed to without issue.
However, Mr. Diaz de la Portilla stated that beyond these initial requests, the developer received an extensive list of additional demands from ISD. He noted that these subsequent requests would require placing heavy waste-generating uses on property that was already environmentally contaminated. Mr. Diaz de la Portilla questioned the logic of remediating and cleaning up a brownfield site only to then introduce activities that would generate hazardous waste, such as boat repair operations, equipment storage, materials stacking, and access for dump trucks, flatbed trucks, and cranes.
Mr. Diaz de la Portilla emphasized that the upland portion of the property measured less than half an acre, which made it physically impossible to accommodate the extensive list of incompatible uses while simultaneously developing affordable housing, green space, and the economic development activities that the district commissioner envisioned for the site. He reiterated that the developer maintained no objection to providing police and fire departments with access to the boat ramp. Nevertheless, the comprehensive list of requests from ISD could not be reconciled with the limited property dimensions and the residential development plan. Mr. Diaz de la Portilla concluded by restating that the property was contaminated brownfield land requiring remediation, and it made no sense to place hazardous waste-generating activities on the property immediately following environmental cleanup.
Commissioner Gonzalez noted that an area was needed for public safety maintenance operations and referenced a planned dog walkway.
Mr. Goldstein responded that the full design for the portion of the project the developer hoped to acquire had not been finalized and could include various amenities, potentially including but not limited to a dog walk area.
Commissioner Gonzalez stated that the developer had negotiated in good faith and invested considerable time attempting to bring an important project to the river. However, he expressed concern that the Board was not prepared to vote because the consequences of relinquishing the property remained unclear. He stated this represented a significant administrative failure that should not recur.
Commissioner Gonzalez moved to defer the resolution until presentation of the comprehensive report, which was expected within 30 days. Commissioner Regalado seconded the motion.
Commissioner Hardemon spoke in opposition to the deferral motion. He discussed patterns of governmental delay, noting that when officials request waiting for additional information, extended periods often pass without resolution. Commissioner Hardemon referenced the property's 30-year history of County ownership without utilization and questioned why sudden urgency had emerged. He stated that in his community, when someone says to wait because they will return shortly, it is often wise not to remain waiting. Commissioner Hardemon argued that sufficient discussion had occurred and that continued delay would prevent progress. He urged the Board to vote against the deferral and proceed with the decision.
Commissioner Bermudez asked Commissioner Bastien whether deferring the decision would impact the housing development opportunity given that negotiations had been ongoing for over a year. Commissioner Bastien responded that she did not object to a 30-day deferral for the report. She reiterated that from the beginning, she had committed to addressing public safety and fire safety needs, and the developer had agreed to accommodate those requirements. She requested Board support to advance the item.
Commissioners McGhee and Cabrera spoke in opposition to the deferral. They argued that governmental delays often extended far beyond initially stated timeframes and that the Board should proceed with a decision.
Mayor Levine Cava clarified that she had not requested 30 days and that the report would be prepared for the next Board meeting.
Chairman Gilbert III stated his opposition to deferral. He noted that Chief Jadallah had testified that the proposed uses were fundamentally incompatible. Chairman Gilbert III stated that if the uses were incompatible, the underlying issues would not change regardless of additional time, and the Board could make a decision based on the information already presented.
The motion to defer failed on a voice vote.
Commissioner Bastien then moved adoption of the resolution. Commissioner Cabrera seconded the motion.
Commissioner Higgins stated that extensive discussion had occurred at the Housing Committee meeting regarding this item. She expressed disappointment that the comprehensive property report was not available concurrently with the resolution. Commissioner Higgins noted that she had spoken with a representative of the developer and had understood from that conversation that the developer could not accommodate fire boats but could potentially accommodate police boats. However, during the current discussion, it appeared the developer was stating that boat ramp access could accommodate both police and fire vessels. She requested clarification.
Mr. Diaz de la Portilla clarified that from the beginning, the developer's position had been to accommodate boat ramp use for both police and fire departments.
Commissioner Higgins asked whether the same accommodation would extend to the Department of Transportation and Public Works. She noted that DTPW utilized the site for bridge repair operations, as the property had not been vacant. DTPW conducted maintenance work on bridges in the area. Commissioner Higgins referenced page 3 of the resolution, specifically the second "whereas" clause, and proposed adding language to specify "for police, fire and Department of Transportation use" after the phrase "a boat ramp," with corresponding changes to the operative clauses.
Commissioner Regalado asked about ingress and egress for vessels accessing the ramp. Mr. Diaz de la Portilla responded that boat ramp access for police, fire, and the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources would be available from both the waterway and from land.
Commissioner Higgins requested that the amendment explicitly clarify that boat ramp access from both water and land would be available to Miami-Dade Police, Fire Rescue, the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, (DERM) and the Department of Transportation and Public Works, with conforming changes to the resolution's operative sections.
Commissioner Steinberg requested clarification regarding statements that the parcel had been unused for 30 years. Mayor Levine Cava responded that the property had only become available within the past year. She explained that the property had not been available for 30 years because a lease encumbered the property, and following litigation, the property became available within the year. Mayor Levine Cava stated that both the Department of Transportation and Public Works and the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources had been utilizing the property.
Ms. Lisa Spadafina explained that DERM had leased a portion of the westernmost section of the property from Public Works through a permit arrangement since 1986. She stated that another contractor had permission from Public Works to operate on a different portion of the property. Ms. Spadafina noted that during the past year, Public Works had utilized the site for dispatching vessels.
Commissioner Steinberg stated that she could not support the resolution because she lacked sufficient information to make an informed decision.
Commissioner Gonzalez expressed support for Commissioner Higgins's proposed amendment. He asked whether machinery required to lift boats onto the ramp would be accommodated.
Mr. Diaz de la Portilla confirmed that the mobile travel lift machine used to remove boats from the water would be accommodated.
Hearing no other questions or comments, the Board proceeded to vote on the resolution as amended to add the words �for police, fire and Department of Transportation use� after the words �a boat ramp� on Page 3, second �whereas� clause; and to clarify that boat ramp access be available from the water and land for the Miami-Dade Police, Fire Rescue, Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER), Department of Transportation and Public Works, and that the appropriate therefore clauses be added to the item.
Following consideration of this item, the Board recessed at 1:56 p.m. to attend the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) meeting and reconvened at 2:45 p.m.
|
|
|
5A SUPPLEMENT
|
|
| |
241347
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION RE: RESOLUTION DECLARING AS SURPLUS A COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2750 NW 20TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA (FOLIO NO. 01-3133-007-0040) (�PROPERTY�); REVISING THE INVENTORY LIST OF REAL PROPERTIES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 125.379, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO INCLUDE THE PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE FULL BOARD MEMBERSHIP THE CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY TO GOLDSTEIN KITE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC OR ITS AFFILIATE 1960 NW 27TH AVE LLC (�DEVELOPER�)
|
Presented
|
| |
7/8/2024
Forwarded to BCC by the Housing, Recreation, Culture & Community Dev. Cmte
|
|
| |
7/16/2024
Presented by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
|
5B
|
|
| |
241610
|
Ordinance
|
Kevin Marino Cabrera
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO REQUIRED REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS WHENEVER THE COUNTY SELLS OR IS INVOLVED IN A LEASE OF REAL ESTATE AS A LESSOR OR LESSEE; AMENDING SECTION 2-10.4.2 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO PERMIT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO WAIVE SUCH REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT A RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNTY MAYOR; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Deferred
to
No Date Certain
Ordinance
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
During the consideration of the motion to set the agenda, the Board deferred the foregoing proposed ordinance to no date certain as requested by the prime sponsor.
|
|
| |
9/4/2024
Adopted on 1st reading, PH & 2nd reading scheduled for 9.17.24 BCC by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
| |
9/4/2024
Tentatively scheduled for a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
|
5B SUPPLEMENT
|
|
| |
241717
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ORDINANCE RELATING TO REQUIRED REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS WHENEVER THE COUNTY SELLS OR IS INVOLVED IN A LEASE OF REAL ESTATE AS A LESSOR OR LESSEE; AMENDING SECTION 2-10.4.2 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO PERMIT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO WAIVE SUCH REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT A RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNTY MAYOR; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Deferred
to
No Date Certain
Supplement
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
5B SUPPLEMENT NO. 2
|
|
| |
241719
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
SOCIAL EQUITY STATEMENT TO ORDINANCE RELATING TO REQUIRED REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS WHENEVER THE COUNTY SELLS OR IS INVOLVED IN A LEASE OF REAL ESTATE AS A LESSOR OR LESSEE; AMENDING SECTION 2-10.4.2 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO PERMIT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO WAIVE SUCH REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT A RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNTY MAYOR; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Deferred
to
No Date Certain
Supplement
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
5C
|
|
| |
241591
|
Ordinance
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY 30X30 VISION COUNCIL; AMENDING SECTIONS 2-2422 AND 2-477 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO INCLUDE STAFF AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE 30X30 VISION COUNCIL AMONG THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND BUDGETARY AFFAIRS AND THE COMMISSION AUDITOR; DIRECTING THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND BUDGETARY AFFAIRS AND THE COMMISSION AUDITOR TO INCLUDE SUCH RESPONSIBILITIES IN ANY FUTURE ANNUAL WORK PLANS AND AMENDING CURRENT WORK PLANS TO INCLUDE SUCH RESPONSIBILITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Adopted
Ordinance 24-93
Mover: Danielle Cohen Higgins
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed ordinance.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the public hearing, and closed the public hearing after no one appeared wishing to speak.
Hearing no objections, the Board voted on the foregoing proposed ordinance, as presented.
|
|
| |
9/4/2024
Adopted on first reading by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
| |
9/4/2024
Tentatively scheduled for a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
5C SUPPLEMENT
|
|
| |
241706
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
SOCIAL EQUITY STATEMENT TO ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY 30X30 VISION COUNCIL; AMENDING SECTIONS 2-2422 AND 2-477 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO INCLUDE STAFF AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE 30X30 VISION COUNCIL AMONG THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND BUDGETARY AFFAIRS AND THE COMMISSION AUDITOR; DIRECTING THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND BUDGETARY AFFAIRS AND THE COMMISSION AUDITOR TO INCLUDE SUCH RESPONSIBILITIES IN ANY FUTURE ANNUAL WORK PLANS AND AMENDING CURRENT WORK PLANS TO INCLUDE SUCH RESPONSIBILITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Presented
|
|
5C SUPPLEMENT NO 2
|
|
| |
241715
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY 30X30 VISION COUNCIL; AMENDING SECTIONS 2-2422 AND 2-477 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO INCLUDE STAFF AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE 30X30 VISION COUNCIL AMONG THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND BUDGETARY AFFAIRS AND THE COMMISSION AUDITOR; DIRECTING THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND BUDGETARY AFFAIRS AND THE COMMISSION AUDITOR TO INCLUDE SUCH RESPONSIBILITIES IN ANY FUTURE ANNUAL WORK PLANS AND AMENDING CURRENT WORK PLANS TO INCLUDE SUCH RESPONSIBILITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Presented
|
|
5D
|
|
| |
241602
|
Ordinance
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Keon Hardemon
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA; AMENDING SECTION 33-11 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; REVISING REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS PERTAINING TO FENCES; PROVIDING ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCES FOR FENCES AT CERTAIN HISTORICALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Adopted
Ordinance 24-94
Mover: Danielle Cohen Higgins
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Geri Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed ordinance.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the public hearing, and closed the public hearing after no one appeared wishing to speak.
Hearing no objections, the Board voted on the foregoing proposed ordinance, as presented.
|
|
| |
9/4/2024
Adopted on 1st reading, PH & 2nd reading scheduled for 9.17.24 BCC by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
| |
9/4/2024
Tentatively scheduled for a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
|
5D SUPPLEMENT
|
|
| |
241700
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA; AMENDING SECTION 33-11 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; REVISING REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS PERTAINING TO FENCES; PROVIDING ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCES FOR FENCES AT CERTAIN HISTORICALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Presented
|
|
5D SUPPLEMENT NO. 2
|
|
| |
241701
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
SOCIAL EQUITY STATEMENT TO ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA; AMENDING SECTION 33-11 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; REVISING REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS PERTAINING TO FENCES; PROVIDING ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCES FOR FENCES AT CERTAIN HISTORICALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Presented
|
|
5E
|
|
| |
241563
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Danielle Cohen Higgins
Sen. Rene Garcia
Eileen Higgins
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION NAMING A 15-ACRE PINE ROCKLAND PRESERVE, MANAGED BY THE COUNTY�S DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT�S ENVIRONMENTALLY ENDANGERED LANDS PROGRAM, AND LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF SW 190TH STREET AND SW 140TH AVENUE, AS THE ''SEAN W. MCCRACKINE PINELAND PRESERVE''(Regulatory and Economic Resources)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-784-24
Mover: Danielle Cohen Higgins
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed resolution.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the public hearing, and closed the public hearing after no one appeared wishing to speak.
Hearing no objections, the Board voted on the foregoing proposed resolution, as presented.
|
|
|
5E SUPPLEMENT
|
|
| |
241704
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING RESOLUTION NAMING A 15-ACRE PINE ROCKLAND PRESERVE, MANAGED BY THE COUNTY�S DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT�S ENVIRONMENTALLY ENDANGERED LANDS PROGRAM, AND LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF SW 190TH STREET AND SW 140TH AVENUE, AS THE ''SEAN W. MCCRACKINE PINELAND PRESERVE''(Clerk of the Board)
|
Presented
|
|
5F
|
|
| |
241176
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Kionne L. McGhee
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED MIAMI-DADE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS SOUTH DADE TRANSIT OPERATIONS CENTER, LOCATED AT 12805 BISCAYNE DRIVE, WITH TEMPORARY ACCESS FROM A PRIVATE STREET (BISCAYNE DRIVE), PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNMENTAL FACILITY PROCESS IN SECTION 33-303 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY(Regulatory and Economic Resources)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-805-24
Mover: Danielle Cohen Higgins
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed resolution.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the public hearing, and closed the public hearing after no one appeared wishing to speak.
Hearing no objections, the Board voted on the foregoing proposed resolution, as presented.
|
|
|
5G
|
|
| |
241594
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF CALDWELL MARTIN TOWNHOMES FILED BY LENNAR HOMES, LLC, LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 56 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST (BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY SW 232 STREET, ON THE EAST APPROXIMATELY 90 FEET WEST OF SW 131 COURT, ON THE SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET NORTH OF SW 233 STREET, AND ON THE WEST BY SW 132 AVENUE)(Regulatory and Economic Resources)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-806-24
Mover: Danielle Cohen Higgins
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Geri Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed resolution.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the public hearing, and closed the public hearing after no one appeared wishing to speak.
Hearing no objections, the Board voted on the foregoing proposed resolution, as presented.
|
|
|
5H
|
|
| |
241595
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF TAMIAMI STORAGE FILED BY TAMIAMI STORAGE LLC, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST (BOUNDED ON THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY 260 FEET SOUTH OF SW 8 STREET, ON THE EAST BY SW 143 AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 280 FEET NORTH OF SW 9 STREET, AND ON THE WEST APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET EAST OF SW 144 AVENUE)(Regulatory and Economic Resources)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-807-24
Mover: Danielle Cohen Higgins
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed resolution.
Chairman Gilbert III opened the public hearing, and closed the public hearing after no one appeared wishing to speak.
Hearing no objections, the Board voted on the foregoing proposed resolution, as presented.
|
|
|
6A
|
CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
|
| |
|
6B
|
POLICY MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION BY THE BOARD
|
| |
|
7
|
ORDINANCES SET FOR SECOND READING
|
| |
|
7A
|
|
| |
240686
|
Ordinance
|
Keon Hardemon
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM-DEVELOPMENT ZONE; AMENDING SECTIONS 33C-2 AND 33C-3.3 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; EXPANDING THE SMART CORRIDOR SUBZONE OF THE RAPID TRANSIT ZONE TO ENCOMPASS CERTAIN PRIVATE PROPERTIES WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF THE CULMER METRORAIL STATION; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Deferred
to
October 1, 2024
Mover: Keon Hardemon
Seconder: Juan Carlos Bermudez
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
Commissioner Hardemon requested a deferral of the foregoing proposed ordinance to the next Board meeting scheduled for October 1, 2024.
Hearing no questions or comments, the Board deferred the foregoing proposed ordinance to October 1, 2024, Board meeting.
|
|
| |
4/25/2024
Requires Municipal Notification by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
| |
5/7/2024
Adopted on first reading by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
| |
5/7/2024
Tentatively scheduled for a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
| |
5/31/2024
Municipalities notified of public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
| |
7/10/2024
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation following a public hearing by the Transportation, Mobility, and Planning Cmte.
|
|
| |
9/4/2024
Deferred by the Board of County Commissioners
|
|
|
8
|
DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS
|
| |
|
8A
|
AVIATION DEPARTMENT
|
| |
|
8A1
|
|
| |
241539
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Roberto J. Gonzalez
Kevin Marino Cabrera
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING, PURSUANT TO SECTION 125.35(1)(B)(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, A DEVELOPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY, AS LANDLORD, AND KTMB ACQUISITIONS, LLC, AS TENANT AND DEVELOPER, FOR A 971,388-SQUARE FOOT PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MIAMI EXECUTIVE AIRPORT, ABUTTING SW 136TH STREET, FOR A TERM OF 35 YEARS WITH ONE FIVE-YEAR RENEWAL OPTION, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FIXED BASE OPERATOR TERMINAL AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES, WITH A MINIMUM INVESTMENT OF $14,750,000.00 AND AN ESTIMATED $15,824,407.60 IN RENT AND OTHER REVENUE DUE TO THE COUNTY OVER THE INITIAL TERM; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE LEASE, TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE SAME, AND TO EXERCISE ALL RIGHTS CONFERRED THEREIN, INCLUDING THE TERMINATION RIGHTS; AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO PROVIDE AN EXECUTED COPY OF THE LEASE TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER�S OFFICE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF LEASE EXECUTION(Aviation Department)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-808-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
8A1 SUPPLEMENT
|
|
| |
241643
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR RESOLUTION APPROVING, PURSUANT TO SECTION 125.35(1)(B)(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, A DEVELOPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY, AS LANDLORD, AND KTMB ACQUISITIONS, LLC, AS TENANT AND DEVELOPER, FOR A 971,388-SQUARE FOOT PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MIAMI EXECUTIVE AIRPORT, ABUTTING SW 136TH STREET, FOR A TERM OF 35 YEARS WITH ONE FIVE-YEAR RENEWAL OPTION, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FIXED BASE OPERATOR TERMINAL AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES, WITH A MINIMUM INVESTMENT OF $14,750,000.00 AND AN ESTIMATED $15,824,407.60 IN RENT
|
Presented
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to BCC by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
8B THRU 8D
|
(No items were submitted for these sections.)
|
| |
|
8E
|
FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT
|
| |
|
8E1
|
|
| |
241624
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING INTERLOCAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN NORTH BAY VILLAGE AS DEVELOPER AND LANDLORD, AND MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, AS TENANT, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND LEASE OF A FIRE RESCUE STATION LOCATED AT 1335 79TH STREET CAUSEWAY, IN EXCHANGE FOR A CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION OF $7,425,000.00 AND NOMINAL RENT OF $1.00 ANNUALLY DURING THE 90-YEAR TERM; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OR THE MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE INTERLOCAL DEVELOPMENT AND LEASE AGREEMENTS AND EXERCISE ANY AND ALL OTHER RIGHTS CONFERRED THEREIN AND TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE SAME(Miami-Dade Fire and Rescue Department)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-809-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
9/10/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Community Safety, Security & Emergency Mgmt. Cmte.
|
|
|
8F
|
INTERNAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
|
| |
|
8F1
|
|
| |
241362
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Kionne L. McGhee
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE WALL OF HEROES MONUMENT; WAIVING THE REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN SECTION 5 OF RESOLUTION NO. R-726-22 REQUIRING THE IDENTIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDING NECESSARY TO FULFILL BUDGETARY NEEDS FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT ENTERED FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE WALL OF HEROES MONUMENT; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO TERMINATE FOR CONVENIENCE CONTRACT NO. I190256 BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND BRANCH ENTERPRISES LLC WITH AN ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT OF $35,130.13; FINDING IT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COUNTY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1(B)(3) OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT, TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO DAKOTA GRANITE CO. FOR THE FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE WALL OF HEROES MONUMENT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,000,000.00, INCLUSIVE OF ANY ANCILLARY CONSTRUCTION SERVICES WHICH SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED CONTRACTOR; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF SUCH CONTRACT; AND WAIVING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. R-130-06(Internal Services)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-810-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Housing, Recreation, Culture & Community Dev. Cmte
|
|
|
8F2
|
|
| |
241679
|
Resolution
|
Eileen Higgins
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING BY AN EXTRAORDINARY VOTE PURSUANT TO SECTION 125.355, FLORIDA STATUTES, A CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE BETWEEN CUTLER BAY LODGING, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS SELLER, AND MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, AS BUYER, FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 87,626 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY IMPROVED WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 46,415 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING LOCATED AT 10821 CARIBBEAN BLVD, CUTLER BAY, FLORIDA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,000,000.00; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF $14,000,000.00 FOR PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY, UP TO $40,000.00 FOR CLOSING COSTS, AND UP TO $950,000.00 FOR PROPERTY RETROFITTING FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $14,990,000.00 FUNDED FROM MIAMI-DADE COUNTY�S HOMES PLAN, AND ONE PERCENT FOOD AND BEVERAGE TAX FUNDS; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE, EXERCISE ALL RIGHTS CONFERRED THEREIN, TO ACCEPT CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY BY GENERAL WARRANTY DEED, AND TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE SAID PURCHASE AND CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY(Internal Services)
|
Withdrawn
|
| |
REPORT:
See Agenda Item 8F2 Substitute, Legislative File Number 241716.
|
|
|
8F2 SUBSTITUTE
|
|
| |
241716
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Eileen Higgins
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING BY AN EXTRAORDINARY VOTE PURSUANT TO SECTION 125.355, FLORIDA STATUTES, A CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE BETWEEN CUTLER BAY LODGING, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS SELLER, AND MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, AS BUYER, FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 87,626 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY IMPROVED WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 46,415 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING LOCATED AT 10821 CARIBBEAN BLVD, CUTLER BAY, FLORIDA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,000,000.00; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF $14,000,000.00 FOR PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY, UP TO $40,000.00 FOR CLOSING COSTS, AND UP TO $950,000.00 FOR PROPERTY RETROFITTING FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $14,990,000.00 FUNDED FROM MIAMI-DADE COUNTY�S HOMES PLAN, AND ONE PERCENT FOOD AND BEVERAGE TAX FUNDS; SETTING REQUIREMENTS FOR OPERATION OF THE PROPERTY AND REQUIRING A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE, EXERCISE ALL RIGHTS CONFERRED THEREIN, TO ACCEPT CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY BY GENERAL WARRANTY DEED, AND TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE SAID PURCHASE AND CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 241679](Internal Services)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-811-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Kionne L. McGhee
Vote: 11 - 2
No: Cohen Higgins , Garc�a
|
| |
REPORT:
Commissioner Higgins informed the Board that she had met with representatives from the Town of Cutler Bay and that the substitute item incorporated all requests from the Town.
Senator Garcia questioned how the County would ensure that restrictive covenants would be enforceable in connection with the item.
ACA Shannon Summerset-Williams explained that Section 5 of the proposed resolution provided for a restrictive covenant to be recorded in the public records, which would be enforceable by Miami-Dade County. She stated that the covenant would include all items listed in Section 4 and would be recorded against the property to ensure compliance.
Senator Garcia shifted the discussion to the Homeless Trust, questioning whether beds would be taken offline due to the proposed $4 million expenditure for the subject property. He noted that an issue with Camillus House regarding bed pricing would be coming before the Board and acknowledged that costs had increased across the board. He asked about the current status of negotiations with Camillus House.
Mr. Ronald Book responded that the Homeless Trust had continued ongoing dialogue with Camillus House leadership to find middle ground. However, he stated that the Trust could not meet Camillus House's request of $67 per bed per night without creating significant issues among other providers. Mr. Book explained that the Trust had made numerous offers to Camillus House on pricing and cash flow arrangements, including a 90-day advance at an increased rate. He noted that discussions had also occurred about altering some facilities to facilitate additional housing units rather than shelter beds. Mr. Book assured the Board that the Trust shared their concerns and was working diligently to find a solution, though he acknowledged the difficulty when multiple providers were involved.
Senator Garcia emphasized that the Board had been given assurances that no beds would go offline, yet now approximately 100 beds for homeless individuals were potentially at risk. He asked what the Trust planned to do if the beds were taken offline.
Mr. Book reiterated that the Trust was working diligently to prevent that outcome. He stated that the Trust had engaged with Camillus House leadership and all providers in the continuum of care, including those contracted with Camillus House. Mr. Book added that he had also reached out to the City of Miami Mayor regarding the issue.
Senator Garcia expressed growing reservations about the item, stating his concern that losing beds might result in facilities being used for purposes other than addressing homelessness. He asked whether there had been conversations with the County Mayor's office about using other facilities for beds.
Mayor Levine Cava responded that extensive conversations had occurred regarding plans to meet the October 1 and January 1 deadlines. She indicated that an updated report was forthcoming, which would outline numerous opportunities the Administration was actively exploring.
Senator Garcia expressed frustration at being asked to approve a plan that could potentially take beds offline without clear information about alternatives.
Mr. Book sought to clarify the distinction between housing units and shelter beds, noting that these were different issues. He stated that daily communication was occurring with the County Mayor's office and that staff was working to identify additional opportunities. Mr. Book mentioned that the Trust had located a property in Chairman Gilbert's district and was in negotiations to rent the entire building. He emphasized that the Trust was actively seeking to fill both beds and housing units and pledged continued work on the matter.
Senator Garcia expressed further concern and frustration about beds going offline in connection with the proposed resolution. He clarified that the item concerned the La Quinta Inn property and the potential loss of 100 beds. Senator Garcia reminded Board members that they had received a memorandum from Camillus House on the matter and stated he would not vote for the resolution.
Chairman Gilbert III responded to Senator Garcia's concerns by explaining that the Trust was developing a plan to ensure beds would not go offline. He noted that the state legislature had recently passed mandates, after which Camillus House subsequently increased their bed costs significantly. Chairman Gilbert III characterized this as challenging for the community because while the Homeless Trust collected its own revenue, ultimately the County's General Fund would bear the financial burden. He stated that the County could not afford to pay the requested bed costs and encouraged all parties to work with Senator Garcia on developing a comprehensive plan.
A discussion ensued between Senator Garcia and Chairman Gilbert III regarding the use of proprietary funds, bed purchases, and planning approaches. Mr. Book noted that if additional funding were provided, it would be directed toward Camillus House. He referenced the plan attached to Mayor Levine Cava's memorandum dated September 3, 2024, which had been sent prior to the previous Board meeting.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated that her primary concern had consistently been the financial aspects of the proposed transaction. She noted that the Board had received correspondence from Camillus House indicating ongoing negotiations with the Homeless Trust that had not yet reached agreement on necessary funding. As a result, approximately 90 beds were at risk of being taken offline. Commissioner Cohen Higgins explained that Camillus House had sent similar letters to other municipalities, with the aggregate total of at-risk beds exceeding 238. She stated that when she contacted Camillus House about the October 1 deadline that created urgency for the item, they responded that if the funding gap was not closed by September 30, the County would lose access to 238 beds.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins addressed the financial considerations underlying her concerns. She questioned how the Homeless Trust could afford to spend $4 to $5 million over the appraised value of the property outlined in the resolution, particularly during a tight budget season. She explained that according to Camillus House, the issue stemmed from their current rate of $31 per bed, which had remained unchanged for 12 years. Camillus House, using external auditors, had determined the actual cost was $67 per bed and needed that gap closed to continue providing emergency shelter beds to the County's unsheltered population. Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated that for reasons unclear to her, the Homeless Trust would not close the $1.2 million gap. She questioned the logic of authorizing an expenditure of $4.5 million over appraised value to acquire 107 beds while simultaneously losing 238 beds when only $1.2 million was needed to preserve the existing capacity.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins acknowledged that she understood the distinction between housing and shelter beds and recognized the Homeless Trust's goal of pursuing housing as part of the continuum of care. However, she emphasized that within two weeks, homeless and unsheltered individuals would be at risk of incarceration due to their poverty status. She stated that if the County's goal was to prevent as many arrests as possible, the Board's vote should reflect that objective.
Commissioner Hardemon addressed what he characterized as confusion regarding the Camillus House situation. He asked whether the County would continue to have beds available at Camillus House.
Mayor Levine Cava responded that when the pricing challenge came to her attention, she had spoken with the involved parties and elected officials from other jurisdictions. She stated that all parties agreed there were valid reasons why it was not sustainable for the County to pay higher rates at Camillus House when other facilities also contributed to bed costs. Mayor Levine Cava indicated that conversations were ongoing to reach a resolution.
Commissioner Hardemon asked whether there would be a decrease in the physical number of beds at Camillus House. Mayor Levine Cava responded that Camillus House had indicated they had a deadline at the end of the month, after which they would no longer provide beds unless the higher rate was paid.
Commissioner Hardemon sought clarification, noting that the beds physically existed at Camillus House and the issue was payment. He explained that typically the County and municipalities reserved and paid for a certain number of beds. He asked whether Camillus House would turn away homeless individuals when beds were physically available. Commissioner Hardemon questioned whether Camillus House was stating they would no longer house people from certain counties or municipalities that had not paid, effectively refusing to accept homeless individuals despite bed availability.
Commissioner Hardemon noted his understanding of the reservation system, where municipalities and governmental entities reserved and paid for specific numbers of beds while Camillus House provided services. He acknowledged that other organizations and companies operating facilities were in contract negotiations with the Homeless Trust to add capacity, including a facility in his district. He reiterated his question about whether Camillus House would refuse to make beds available to homeless individuals in the community if a municipality had not paid for those specific beds.
Mayor Levine Cava responded that based on her understanding from conversations with the parties involved, Camillus House had stated they would not provide beds for individuals referred to them unless the higher rate was paid.
Commissioner Hardemon noted the irony of the situation, explaining that the County incurred costs when homeless individuals lacked access to beds, including expenses for cleaning, addressing crime in certain areas, and managing gatherings of law-abiding homeless individuals. He expressed surprise that a facility funded by taxpayers to help people would leverage payment or refuse to make beds available.
Senator Garcia responded to Commissioner Hardemon's comments by clarifying that the Homeless Trust was not the only organization dealing with homelessness in the community. He noted that numerous nonprofit organizations and other entities worked with and addressed homelessness in different communities, including churches, synagogues, and various institutions that sought beds for homeless individuals and provided shelter. Senator Garcia stated that suggesting Camillus House would exit the business of sheltering homeless individuals was inaccurate. Rather, the issue concerned which homeless populations were being served and which entities held contracts, similar to how the Homeless Trust managed its contracts. He concluded that the beds would go offline for the Homeless Trust specifically, not for the broader community.
Chairman Gilbert III sought clarification, asking whether all the organizations Senator Garcia referenced were located in Miami-Dade County and whether any came from other counties. Senator Garcia confirmed that all referenced organizations and the homeless individuals they served were located within Miami-Dade County.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that she wanted to reassure everyone that she shared Senator Garcia's concerns about the need for beds. She noted that many of the organizations Senator Garcia mentioned operated under contracts with the Homeless Trust and received funding for beds. Mayor Levine Cava explained that her conversations with the Homeless Trust had focused on expanding bed capacity. She stated that the Trust was developing an updated plan that would include existing subcontracted providers as well as new facilities. Mayor Levine Cava emphasized that the goal was not only to avoid losing beds but to gain additional capacity. She noted that approximately 1,000 individuals were currently unhoused and that the County faced deadlines of October 1 and January 1 for potential liability under Florida House Bill 1365. Mayor Levine Cava stated that the Administration had been working collaboratively, and she had participated in discussions about how the Homeless Trust could add beds on both an emergency basis and for long-term housing. She emphasized that both approaches were necessary rather than choosing one over the other, because creating more permanent housing would free up shelter space for individuals on the streets.
Commissioner Regalado stated that the Board should have a broader discussion about the homeless service paradigm. She noted that she had served on the Chapman Partnership board for seven years during the Camillus House restructuring period. Commissioner Regalado explained that during her tenure, a proposal had been presented to the City of Miami and the County regarding Camillus House operating a vocational program, with facilities created for that purpose. She noted that subsequent decisions had converted some temporary units into semi-permanent units. Commissioner Regalado stated that when discussing beds, as Commissioner Hardemon had done, the Board should not view that number in isolation. She explained that bed numbers encompassed the services provided at facilities. Commissioner Regalado suggested that if the Board wanted to examine Camillus House's mission, fundraising efforts, services provided, and contracting arrangements for beds, that would require a comprehensive discussion. She noted that Camillus House had raised bed costs and provided information to the County, but the situation involved numerous complex factors. Commissioner Regalado stated that examining different organizations revealed variations in pricing and services, suggesting this warranted thorough consideration rather than simplified comparisons.
Hearing no further questions or comments, the Board proceeded to vote on the foregoing proposed resolution as presented.
|
|
|
8G THRU 8J
|
(No items were submitted for these sections.)
|
| |
|
8K
|
PUBLIC HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
|
| |
|
8K1
|
|
| |
241571
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Kevin Marino Cabrera
Roberto J. Gonzalez
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO DISSOLVE THE PUBLIC HOUSING WAITING LIST AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2024 AND THEREAFTER OPEN SUCH WAITING LIST COMMENCING ON OCTOBER 15, 2024, AND ENDING ON OCTOBER 25, 2024; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO RECEIVE AND PROCESS APPLICATIONS RECEIVED DURING THE PERIOD SET FORTH HEREIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND THE ADMISSION AND CONTINUED OCCUPANCY POLICY(Public Housing and Community Development)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-812-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Marleine Bastien
Vote: 12 - 0
Absent: McGhee
|
| |
REPORT:
ACA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed resolution into the record.
Commissioner Gonzalez commended staff for successfully exhausting the 2014 public housing waiting list. He noted that confusion had arisen during the committee meeting regarding the differences between two distinct waiting lists and asked Mr. Clarence Brown, Deputy Director of the Department of Public Housing and Community Development, to clarify the distinctions.
Mr. Brown explained that several months earlier, the Board had approved dissolution of the waiting list for the Section 8 housing program, which resulted in the Department receiving 132,000 applications. He clarified that Section 8 was a tenant-based program where assistance followed the participant, allowing them to move from unit to unit. In contrast, the item before the Board concerned public housing units that the County owned, controlled, and operated directly.
Commissioner Gonzalez confirmed that the item addressed public housing as opposed to Section 8 housing. He noted that the Section 8 list had opened in 2021 and reopened earlier in the year, with a cap of 5,000 applicants, while the public housing list outlined in the current resolution had a cap of 7,500 applicants. He asked what accounted for the difference, particularly given that processing the 5,000 Section 8 applications had taken three years.
Commissioner Gonzalez also sought confirmation that the County intended to reopen the public housing list annually.
Mr. Brown responded that the goal was to process applications within a reasonable timeframe, though that might not always occur within a single year. He explained that the previous cycle had taken three years to process 5,000 applications. Therefore, the Department was evaluating attrition rates, projected unit losses, and the number of applicants who could be accommodated from the list to determine appropriate timing for reopening.
Commissioner Gonzalez requested to be added as a co-sponsor of the resolution.
Commissioner Bastien stated for the record that she understood the necessity of dissolving and reopening the list. She noted that the Department of Public Housing and Community Development had assured her that no current applicants would lose their position or be required to reapply. Commissioner Bastien emphasized that it was a priority to ensure residents who spoke English, Spanish, and Creole would receive information in their respective languages. Additionally, she stated that the Department would make every effort to work with each district commissioner to ensure residents received proper notification. Commissioner Bastien highlighted the continued commitment to accessibility, noting that not all residents were technologically proficient. She requested confirmation that the Department would provide paper applications to residents who needed them.
Mr. Brown confirmed the Department's commitment to providing paper applications for those who required them.
Hearing no further questions or comments, the Board voted on the foregoing proposed resolution, as presented.
|
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Housing, Recreation, Culture & Community Dev. Cmte
|
|
|
8L and 8M
|
(No items were submitted for these sections.)
|
| |
|
8N
|
TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
|
| |
|
8N1
|
|
| |
241562
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Kevin Marino Cabrera
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CONVEYANCES OF TWO PROPERTY INTERESTS FOR ROAD PURPOSES TO MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE ACCEPTANCES OF THE INSTRUMENTS OF CONVEYANCE(Transportation and Public Works)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-813-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
8N2
|
|
| |
241565
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Kionne L. McGhee
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CONVEYANCES OF SIX PROPERTY INTERESTS FOR ROAD PURPOSES TO MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE ACCEPTANCES OF THE INSTRUMENTS OF CONVEYANCE(Transportation and Public Works)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-814-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
8O
|
(No items were submitted for this section.)
|
| |
|
8P
|
STRATEGIC PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT
|
| |
|
8P1
|
|
| |
241011
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. EVN0003886 TO RQ VENDING LLC FOR VENDING MACHINES IN A TOTAL AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE OVER $1,000,000.00 IN REVENUE FOR A FIVE-YEAR TERM FOR MULTIPLE COUNTY DEPARTMENTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO GIVE NOTICE OF THIS AWARD TO THE RECOMMENDED VENDOR AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT, INCLUDING ANY CANCELLATION OR EXTENSIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-38(Strategic Procurement)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-815-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
8P2
|
|
| |
241508
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. EVN0003072 TO LIMOUSINES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. FOR DADE-MONROE, CARD SOUND EXPRESS ROUTES IN A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $35,264,661.00 FOR AN EIGHT-YEAR TERM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO GIVE NOTICE OF THIS AWARD TO THE RECOMMENDED VENDOR, ISSUE THE APPROPRIATE PURCHASE ORDERS TO GIVE EFFECT TO SAME AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT, INCLUDING ANY CANCELLATION OR EXTENSIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-38(Strategic Procurement)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-816-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Oliver G. Gilbert, III
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
Commissioner Higgins commented that the item involved switching vendors for ambulance services. She stated that the incoming vendor might want to interview employees who drove the vehicles or buses for potential worker retention purposes.
Hearing no further questions or comments, the Board proceeded to vote on the foregoing proposed resolution, as presented.
|
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
8P3
|
|
| |
241574
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Anthony Rodriguez
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION WAIVING COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURES AND AUTHORIZING A NON-COMPETITIVE CONTRACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5.03(D) OF THE HOME RULE CHARTER AND SECTION 2-8.1(B)(1) OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT, FOR CONTRACT NO. BW-10469 WITH INTER MIAMI VENTURES, LLC FOR A LEASE AND CONCESSION AGREEMENT FOR AN INTER MIAMI CF STORE WITH ESTIMATED REVENUE OF $1,500,000.00 FOR A FIVE-YEAR TERM FOR THE MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT, INCLUDING ANY CANCELLATION OR EXTENSIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1(B) OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-38(Strategic Procurement)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-817-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
8P4
|
|
| |
241611
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. EVN0006904A TO RANDLE EASTERN AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. AND CONTRACT NO. EVN0006904B TO MCT EXPRESS, INC., FOR MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, IN A CUMULATIVE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $22,495,000.00, FOR AN INITIAL FIVE-YEAR TERM AND TWO THREE-YEAR OPTIONS TO RENEW FOR MULTIPLE COUNTY DEPARTMENTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE SAME FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACTS, INCLUDING ANY ASSIGNMENT, CANCELLATION, RENEWALS OR EXTENSIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-38(Strategic Procurement)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-818-24
Mover: Kevin Marino Cabrera
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 12 - 0
Absent: McGhee
|
| |
REPORT:
Commissioner Cabrera stated that his understanding was that the contract outlined in the resolution had existed for over 20 years. He explained how he understood the contract to function and expressed his view that there might be a more efficient approach regarding response times.
Pursuant to a motion read into the record by ACA Michael Valdes, Commissioner Cabrera moved to direct the County Mayor or designee to evaluate the effectiveness of Contract No. EVN0006904 for Medical Transportation Services and provide a report to the Board six months following the resolution's effective date. The report would include: (1) an evaluation of whether the contract could be structured to award contracts to multiple carriers with the closest carrier or the carrier with the lowest estimated time of arrival being dispatched for each call for service, rather than designating primary and secondary carriers where the secondary carrier was only utilized if the primary carrier could not respond within established timelines; (2) a recommendation on the best methodology for determining which contracted carrier among multiple carriers was closest to the site or had the lowest estimated time of arrival; and (3) a comparison of how other local governments handled medical transportation services contracts, including whether they structured contracts with primary and secondary carriers similarly to Miami-Dade County's approach.
Commissioner Regalado seconded the motion, which passed unanimously 12 to 0 (Commissioner McGhee was absent).
Commissioner Regalado echoed Commissioner Cabrera's concerns. She noted that the item was revenue neutral and reminded Board members that the County's fire rescue rating was based on response times. She stated that while there was no price difference between the two carriers, there could be an impact on the County's rating.
Commissioner Regalado expressed support for reviewing the contract structure to determine if a better approach existed.
Hearing no further questions or comments, the Board voted on the foregoing proposed resolution, as presented.
|
|
| |
9/10/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Community Safety, Security & Emergency Mgmt. Cmte.
|
|
|
8P5
|
|
| |
241548
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. EVN0003042 TO FLOTECH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC FOR THE PURCHASE OF LIQUID WASTE HAULING & DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR MDAD IN A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,265,900.00 FOR A FIVE-YEAR TERM FOR THE MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO GIVE NOTICE OF THIS AWARD TO THE RECOMMENDED VENDOR, ISSUE THE APPROPRIATE PURCHASE ORDERS TO GIVE EFFECT TO SAME, AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT, INCLUDING ANY CANCELLATION OR EXTENSIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-38(Strategic Procurement)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-819-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Kionne L. McGhee
Vote: 12 - 0
Absent: Rodriguez
|
| |
9/11/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson due to meeting cancellation by the Airport and Economic Development Committee
|
|
|
9
|
ADDITIONAL DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS
|
| |
|
9A1
|
|
| |
241573
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Keon Hardemon
Kevin Marino Cabrera
Kionne L. McGhee
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PEACE AND PROSPERITY PLAN (''PLAN'') FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,735,203.00; ALLOCATING TO THE FY 2024-25 PLAN: (1) $2,450,000.00 FROM KASEYA CENTER NAMING RIGHTS REVENUES IN THE ANTI-GUN VIOLENCE AND PROSPERITY INITIATIVES TRUST FUND (�TRUST FUND�); (2) $554,703.00 OF CARRYOVER TRUST FUND DOLLARS FROM PRIOR YEARS AND ANTICIPATED CARRYOVER TRUST FUND DOLLARS FROM FY 2023-24; AND (3) $100,000.00 OF CARRYOVER FROM THE JUVENILE SERVICES TRUST FUND FROM FY 2023-24; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO: (1) EXPEND ALL SUCH ALLOCATED FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FY 2024-25 PLAN; (2) SELECT AN ORGANIZATION TO ADMINISTER AND PROVIDE SUB-GRANTS FOR THE SAFE IN THE 305 GRANTS PROGRAM FOR FY 2024-25 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $80,000.00, INCLUSIVE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE, AND TO NEGOTIATE, EXECUTE, AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF SAID AGREEMENT; (3) SELECT AN ENTITY TO EVALUATE THE PLAN, AND TO NEGOTIATE EXECUTE, AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND SAID ENTITY, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $50,000.00; AND (4) APPLY FOR, RECEIVE, AND EXPEND ADDITIONAL GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PLAN UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, AS WELL AS EXECUTE NECESSARY AGREEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN; AND WAIVING RESOLUTION NO. R-130-06(Community Action and Human Services)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-785-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
10
|
AUTHORITIES, BOARDS, COUNCILS AND TRUSTS
|
| |
|
11
|
COUNTY COMMISSION
|
| |
|
11A
|
RESOLUTIONS
|
| |
|
11A1
|
|
| |
241598
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Danielle Cohen Higgins
Juan Carlos Bermudez
Kevin Marino Cabrera
Sen. Rene Garcia
Eileen Higgins
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION URGING THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO ADOPT LEGISLATION AMENDING BOATING SAFETY LAWS TO PROMOTE SAFETY, PREVENT ACCIDENTS, AND ENSURE THAT VIOLATORS ARE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE
|
Adopted
Resolution R-820-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
11A2
|
|
| |
241585
|
Resolution
|
Raquel A. Regalado
Kevin Marino Cabrera
Roberto J. Gonzalez
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AGREEMENTS WITH WESTCARE FLORIDA, INC., AND THE ADVOCATE PROGRAM, INC., FOR THE OPERATION OF AND PROVISION OF SERVICES AT THE MENTAL HEALTH DIVERSION FACILITY, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER (�CENTER�), AND TO PRESENT A WRITTEN RECOMMENDATION ON SUCH AGREEMENTS TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; WAIVING RESOLUTION NO. R-130-06, REQUIRING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENTS BE EXECUTED PRIOR TO PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR APPROVAL; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO APPLY FOR, RECEIVE, AND EXPEND GRANT AND OTHER FUNDING FOR THE OPERATION OF AND PROVISION OF SERVICES AT THE CENTER AS WELL AS EXECUTE AGREEMENTS AND NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF ANY SUCH FUNDING AND TO EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN; RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. R-844-22; ALLOCATING CERTAIN FUNDING THE COUNTY RECOVERS IN IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION OR ANY RELATED MATTER (�OPIOID FUNDING�) TO THE CENTER; DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO PROVIDE A DISBURSEMENT PLAN FOR USE OF THE OPIOID FUNDING; AND REQUIRING REPORTS
|
Amended
|
| |
REPORT:
See Agenda Item 11A2 Amended, Legislative File Number 242083 for the amended version.
|
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
11A2 AMENDED
|
|
| |
242083
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Raquel A. Regalado
Kevin Marino Cabrera
Roberto J. Gonzalez
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AGREEMENTS WITH WESTCARE FLORIDA, INC. (�WESTCARE�), THE VILLAGE SOUTH, INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF WESTCARE, AND THE ADVOCATE PROGRAM, INC., FOR THE OPERATION OF AND PROVISION OF SERVICES AT THE MENTAL HEALTH DIVERSION FACILITY, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER (�CENTER�), AND TO PRESENT A WRITTEN RECOMMENDATION ON SUCH AGREEMENTS TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; WAIVING RESOLUTION NO. R-130-06, REQUIRING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENTS BE EXECUTED PRIOR TO PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR APPROVAL; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO APPLY FOR, RECEIVE, AND EXPEND GRANT AND OTHER FUNDING FOR THE OPERATION OF AND PROVISION OF SERVICES AT THE CENTER AS WELL AS EXECUTE AGREEMENTS AND NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF ANY SUCH FUNDING AND TO EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN; RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. R-844-22; ALLOCATING CERTAIN FUNDING THE COUNTY RECOVERS IN IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION OR ANY RELATED MATTER (�OPIOID FUNDING�) TO THE CENTER; DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO PROVIDE A DISBURSEMENT PLAN FOR USE OF THE OPIOID FUNDING; AND REQUIRING REPORTS [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 241585]
|
Adopted as amended
Resolution R-786-24
Mover: Sen. Rene Garcia
Seconder: Danielle Cohen Higgins
Vote: 12 - 0
Absent: McGhee
|
| |
REPORT:
ACA Shanika Graves read the proposed floor amendment offered by Commissioner Regalado into the record. The amendment specified that the entity with which the Board desired the County Mayor or designee to negotiate an agreement for operating the mental health diversion facility would be The Village South Incorporated (Village South), a subsidiary of Westcare Florida Incorporated (Westcare), with Westcare remaining a party to the agreement to guarantee Village South's obligations.
In response to Senator Garcia's question about the amendment's purpose, Commissioner Regalado explained that it added the subsidiary's name as a precautionary measure in case insurance issues arose later, but did not change Westcare's responsibilities.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated that she was interested in understanding the costs and asked the Administration what the facility's operating costs would be and whether those costs were included in the current fiscal year budget.
Mr. David Clodfelter responded that the Department had not yet developed final costs for the item because this required meeting with the entities involved to develop an operating plan. Mayor Levine Cava added that the Department would present final costs to the Board at a later date.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins sought clarification that the item did not bind the County to obligations beyond negotiating and returning with an agreement. She reiterated her question about whether any dollar amount was currently included in the budget for the project.
Mr. Clodfelter responded that currently there was a $10 million allocation in the American Rescue Plan that could be utilized if needed to maintain the facility now that the County had assumed control of it.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins asked whether this was recurring or one-time funding. Mr. Clodfelter confirmed it was one-time funding.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins noted that projections indicated the County would face a very tight financial situation in the next fiscal year. She expressed concern about the $10 million set aside as one-time funding, particularly given uncertainty about whether actual operating costs would match that amount and what the funding plan would be after the initial allocation was exhausted.
Commissioner Regalado explained that the Administration had been negotiating the item for an extended period. She clarified that when the County provided mental health services inside the jail, no entity existed from which the County could seek reimbursement because services were being provided within the jail setting. However, when the County provided services at the proposed facility and individuals had Medicaid or Medicare coverage, the County could seek reimbursement from the federal government. Commissioner Regalado noted that the Administration had applied for two grants and was pursuing additional grant funding. She stated that one funding source under consideration was opioid settlement funds, which could be utilized for this purpose. Commissioner Regalado explained that structuring the process this way created transparency by requiring the item to return to the Board. She stated that once the County served a specific population, the Administration could track that population to ensure maximum reimbursement.
Commissioner Regalado noted that the facility would serve not only individuals exiting the jail system but also participants in the diversion program for homeless and unhoused individuals who might be arrested due to recent changes in state law. She stated that 35 to 45 percent of this population had benefits, with many being veterans. The County would provide documentation enabling applications for benefits through state and federal programs to obtain reimbursements.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated that her question remained regarding the funding plan for the building after the one-time $10 million allocation was expended.
Mr. Clodfelter stated that the Department would bring back a five-year plan similar to those developed for special taxing districts, showing projected revenues and expenditures.
Senator Garcia asked what the plan was for services, noting his involvement with the project since its inception. He stated that the building had been plagued by numerous financial challenges regarding funding solutions. Senator Garcia noted that Commissioner Regalado had indicated she had been negotiating, yet the resolution directed the Administration to negotiate, which created confusion about where the process currently stood. He asked whether negotiations had already occurred with the two entities named in the item or whether negotiations would now commence.
Mayor Levine Cava responded that the Administration had been working on the item for nearly two years attempting to identify a vendor. She noted that a Request for Interest (RFI) had been issued and that the organization before the Board had emerged from that process. Mayor Levine Cava stated that the Administration had communicated with Commissioner Regalado and the mental health organization throughout the process. She explained that the Administration had reached a point where it sought Board direction before proceeding with further negotiations.
Senator Garcia responded that the Administration was not actually seeking direction because work had already been completed. He cautioned that the Board and Administration needed to be careful about the process because the Administration appeared to be justifying work already done rather than seeking initial direction. Senator Garcia noted his extensive work on mental health advocacy and his efforts, alongside Judge Steve Leifman, to rewrite mental health laws. He stated that when discussions about the mental health facility began, the promise to the community was that it would be a facility treating mental health issues. However, he expressed concern that what was being presented appeared different from that original commitment. Senator Garcia referenced the Camillus House situation where 100 beds were being taken offline and questioned where those beds would come from. He noted the urgency created by changes in state law and expressed concern that the promise to address mental health issues was being redirected toward housing 100 beds as part of a homeless diversion program rather than a mental health diversion program.
Senator Garcia noted that Miami-Dade County was operating under a consent decree and asked whether the item addressed the consent decree between the County's Corrections and Rehabilitation Department and the Department of Justice.
Honorable Judge Steve Leifman, Associate Administrative Judge for the Criminal Division, responded to Senator Garcia's question. He explained that the consent decree addressed relieving jail overcrowding of the mental health population over time. Judge Leifman noted that a mental health diversion program had operated successfully for over 24 years, reducing annual arrests from 118,000 to 40,000 and decreasing recidivism from 75 percent to 20 percent. He stated that the County spent $414 million annually, equivalent to approximately $1.2 million per day, to house 3,500 individuals with serious mental illnesses in the jail. Judge Leifman explained that the courts received daily lists from the County identifying individuals eligible for the diversion program. An analysis had identified 16,000 individuals over five years who were in mental health jail cells and qualified for diversion. These individuals had spent 1.2 million days in the Miami-Dade County jail over that five-year period at a cost of approximately $414 million. Judge Leifman stated that every one of them was eligible for diversion, nearly all were homeless, and they cycled repeatedly through the system.
Judge Leifman explained that this population not only had psychiatric issues but also serious primary health problems. While inmates remained in the County jail, the County bore 100 percent of the costs with no Medicaid, Social Security, or Medicare reimbursement available. However, once individuals transferred to the proposed facility, those eligible for Medicaid�which represented most of them�would enable the County to bill Medicaid for services, thereby leveraging federal dollars.
Judge Leifman discussed data showing that 1,000 individuals who cycled through the system most frequently comprised 26 percent of eligible inmates because they returned repeatedly. These individuals had been arrested five or more times over five years and had spent a total of 273,000 days in Miami-Dade County jail. He described the proposed facility's components: a receiving area, crisis stabilization unit, locked short-term residential facility, and primary health clinic. Judge Leifman explained that high primary healthcare needs resulted from many inmates being ill and self-medicating through smoking. He stated that the County currently spent 100 percent of costs for this population, but the facility would substantially reduce County expenses from the current $414 million annually to approximately $20 to $30 million per year. Based on the County's own data, Judge Leifman stated that the jail population should be reducible by more than half.
Judge Leifman noted that the County had substantially reduced arrests and that police officers had performed exceptionally through the Crisis Intervention Team police program. He stated that law enforcement needed an additional facility to handle the most acutely ill individuals. Judge Leifman explained that the facility was necessary because when community mental health systems were originally designed in America, the most acutely ill psychotic individuals remained in state hospitals, which no longer existed. Community mental health services had been designed for moderately ill individuals with mental illnesses, meaning the system could not adequately serve the 20 to 30 percent of the population who were too severely ill for existing community programs. This facility would provide the County an opportunity to reach that underserved population.
Commissioner Regalado added comments emphasizing the importance of the diversion program. She noted that over 500 unhoused individuals in encampments were bipolar or schizophrenic and would be subject to arrest either immediately or within days under the state mandate.
Commissioner Regalado stated that the mandate forced the County to place unhoused individuals somewhere, and the County did not want to place them in jail. She explained that breaking the cycle required providing mental health services. Commissioner Regalado thanked Judge Leifman for his advocacy and stated that the facility was a necessary component not only for meeting jail requirements as the County transitioned to a sheriff system but also for ensuring compliance with state law while properly serving unhoused individuals requiring mental health treatment.
Senator Garcia and Commissioner Regalado held a brief discussion regarding criteria for the population to be served at the mental health diversion facility.
Ms. Cathy Burgos explained that the facility would provide a continuum of care for severely mentally ill individuals whether they were homeless or not. She emphasized that the project's importance lay in establishing a centralized process that could link individuals to appropriate services.
Senator Garcia questioned why the County had not applied for state funding previously if the intent was to establish the facility as a public-private partnership addressing mental health needs.
Ms. Burgos responded that the Board would see collaborations with individuals and organizations within the community. She stated this would constitute a comprehensive approach to addressing the needs of the severely mentally ill within the community and represented the only viable approach in terms of service delivery. Ms. Burgos explained that the comprehensive approach would serve not only the population within the facility but would also link to community providers to ensure sustainability as client populations changed.
Senator Garcia stated he disagreed that this constituted a comprehensive approach. He argued that the Board was examining a specific population and addressing issues for that particular group rather than the broader community. Senator Garcia asked how the Administration intended to use the $10 million in opioid settlement funds for the project.
Mr. Clodfelter responded that the opioid funds would be used for day-to-day operational expenses as proposed.
Senator Garcia noted his understanding that opioid settlement funds were designated for issues related to opioid usage or addiction.
Ms. Burgos stated that she had thoroughly reviewed information regarding opioid funding and how it was categorized by core strategies. She explained that the County was working with a mentally ill population that tended to self-medicate, creating a co-occurring disorder population with both mental health and substance abuse issues. Ms. Burgos noted that the core strategies included wraparound services for individuals dealing with mental health and substance abuse, as well as screening, assessment, follow-up services, and linkage. She stated that the Community Action and Human Services Department provided those services and had conducted a thorough review of core strategies permitted under opioid funding guidelines.
Senator Garcia agreed that strategies existed and that there were appropriate ways to use the funding, but he reiterated that from his reading, usage must be linked to opioid-related issues.
Ms. Burgos responded that the funding structure allowed addressing needs of mentally ill individuals as well as those with substance abuse issues within the core strategies framework.
Senator Garcia acknowledged that negotiations had occurred with the two organizations outlined in the item and agreed that the advocacy organization could not operate the facility alone. However, he stated that numerous questions remained regarding benchmarking, continuum of care, and how the Board would know actual costs and funding expenditures. Senator Garcia commented that Medicaid represented only a small portion of potential funding sources and that not all individuals using the facility would qualify for Medicaid.
Chairman Gilbert III asked Senator Garcia whether he wanted the County Mayor to examine other organizations as potential partners. Senator Garcia agreed with that approach.
Senator Garcia stated that he wanted to ensure a continuum of care would be provided for the entire community rather than solely one specific population segment.
Commissioner Rodriguez thanked Commissioner Regalado for bringing the item forward. He stated that he understood the facility's purpose and directed his question to Mayor Levine Cava or the Administration regarding whether the RFI had been for operations or services.
Ms. Burgos responded that the RFI had covered both operations and services, with operations including specific services to be provided at the facility. She stated that six respondents had replied to the RFI and proceeded to provide a brief overview of the selection process conducted through the Community Action and Human Services Department.
Commissioner Rodriguez requested documentation listing the six respondents and explaining how the selection committee had reached its decision, including criteria such as finances, expertise, and experience.
Mayor Levine Cava referenced Mr. Morris Copeland, who had led the effort. She explained that while multiple organizations expressed interest, not all were responsive to the RFI, which had been designed to determine interest levels. Mayor Levine Cava provided an overview of events following receipt of the six responses and stated that she could provide the complete RFI record, including respondent information and the Administration's vetting process.
Commissioner Regalado noted that the item included provisions for a five-year plan and referenced Senator Garcia's Ordinance 24-8 establishing oversight through the Miami-Dade County Behavioral Health Advisory Board. She stated that state partners had contacted the County monthly inquiring about funding status, creating a sense of urgency because numerous contributors to the effort wanted to see the facility open. Commissioner Regalado emphasized that the Administration had invested substantial time vetting the item and that significant disparities existed in proposed care types and wraparound services, with some organizations willing to provide comprehensive services while others were not. She noted that the item directed the Administration to negotiate and return to the Board with a five-year plan, which she considered reasonable.
Commissioner Rodriguez stated that he needed assurance that this represented the right decision for the community. He noted that when the item returned, it would likely be in the form of a bid waiver because the property belonged to the state under a long-term County lease. Commissioner Rodriguez stated that the County had invested over $50 million in a facility that remained empty, making it time to take action and respond to taxpayers. He concluded that he would support the item because it would return to the Board for final approval.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated that efforts on the item had spanned over 20 years with expenditures exceeding $50 million. She expressed difficulty accepting that the Administration lacked any estimate of annual operating costs for the facility. Commissioner Cohen Higgins noted concerns about warnings that the next year's budget would be extremely tight with possible millage increases for residents, while simultaneously being presented with an entirely new building lacking dedicated funding. She emphasized the importance of understanding financial aspects of the proposal and questioned why funding had not been set aside over the past five to ten years knowing the facility would come online. She asked for an estimated annual operating cost.
Judge Leifman responded by referencing a pro bono project completed by the Boston Consulting Group, one of the world's largest consulting firms. He stated that the Group had spent one year reviewing the business plan and concluded that the building would become self-sustaining within three years. Judge Leifman stated that Medicaid reimbursements were included in calculations, with annual costs estimated at approximately $20 to $30 million�substantially less than current County expenditures. He noted that substantial professional work had been completed and that he felt comfortable with the Group's analysis, which had been provided at no cost to the County. Judge Leifman stated that the County would work with the state to obtain state funding and pursue other funding sources for services. Additionally, he noted that the federal government offered Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic designations, which contributed to why a specific answer could not be provided that day. Judge Leifman stated that the County might qualify for such designation, which would provide substantial federal contributions to fund facility operations. He estimated that establishing all funding mechanisms would require approximately one to two years but stated that every possible funding source was being pursued.
Senator Garcia stated that the Administration could have approached the matter differently. He noted that operational costs would ultimately be borne by taxpayers and that lacking cost estimates was disturbing. Senator Garcia stated that he would hold the Administration publicly accountable on the matter.
Senator Garcia stated that he would move the item forward and expressed hope that the Administration would negotiate with additional organizations to obtain the best plan for the County. He emphasized the need for a public-private partnership to sustain facility financing because Medicaid reimbursements would not be sufficient.
Mayor Levine Cava requested to clarify for the record that the facility was not part of the consent decree. She stated that the Administration had made clear that the consent decree addressed conditions within the jail and had nothing to do with the mental health facility. Mayor Levine Cava stated that while the mental health facility would be useful and the intent was to keep people out of jail and serve those leaving jail with persistent needs, it was not formally part of the consent decree.
Commissioner Rodriguez asked Commissioner Regalado whether she would accept an amendment to the resolution reflecting Mayor Levine Cava's clarification.
Commissioner Regalado agreed to an amendment stating that only mentally ill individuals could receive services at the facility.
Commissioner Higgins commented that she wanted to ensure mentally ill homeless individuals could receive assistance at the facility.
Hearing no further questions or comments, the Board proceeded to vote on the resolution, as amended to specify that the entity with which the Board desired the County Mayor or designee to negotiate an agreement for operating the mental health diversion facility would be The Village South Incorporated (Village South), a subsidiary of Westcare Florida Incorporated, with Westcare remaining a party to the agreement to guarantee Village South's obligations; and to indicate that the facility could only be used to provide services to mentally ill individuals.
|
|
|
11A3
|
|
| |
241673
|
Resolution
|
Raquel A. Regalado
Sen. Rene Garcia
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY TO ADDRESS THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN UPGRADES TO EXISTING WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT INFRASTRUCTURE; AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT THE POLICY AND PROVIDE A REPORT TO THE BOARD [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 241615]
|
Amended
|
| |
REPORT:
See Agenda Item 11A3 Amended, Legislative File Number 241791 for the amended version.
|
|
| |
9/9/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with favorable recommendation with committee amendments by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
11A3 AMENDED
|
|
| |
241791
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Raquel A. Regalado
Sen. Rene Garcia
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY TO ADDRESS THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN UPGRADES TO EXISTING WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT INFRASTRUCTURE; AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT THE POLICY AND PROVIDE A REPORT TO THE BOARD [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 241673]
|
Adopted as amended
Resolution R-821-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
The foregoing proposed resolution was amended to clarify that private laterals and extensions would not be part of the infrastructure included in the Development Required Infrastructure Policy (DRIP) instead of the $5 million per year spending cap for DRIP; and to clarify that monies collected from developers whose properties benefitted from the DRIP upgrade would be used to replenish the $5 million annual allocation.
|
|
|
11A4
|
|
| |
241674
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Marleine Bastien
Sen. Rene Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPOINTING A VOTING TRUSTEE TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR A TERM EXPIRING MAY 31, 2025, TO FILL A VACANT SEAT DUE TO THE RESIGNATION OF FORMER TRUSTEE MATTHEW J. ALLEN
|
Adopted
Resolution R-822-24
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
11A4 SUPPLEMENT
|
|
| |
241696
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE RESOLUTION APPOINTING A VOTING TRUSTEE TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR A TERM EXPIRING MAY 31, 2025, TO FILL A VACANT SEAT DUE TO THE RESIGNATION OF FORMER TRUSTEE MATTHEW J. ALLEN(Clerk of the Board)
|
Presented
|
|
11A5
|
|
| |
241676
|
Resolution
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE SITE SELECTION FOR A NEW WASTE TO ENERGY FACILITY
|
Deferred
to
November 6, 2024
Mover: Keon Hardemon
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 8 - 5
No: Cohen Higgins , Rodriguez , Gonzalez , Bermudez , Garc�a
|
| |
REPORT:
Mayor Daniella Levine Cava provided background on the matter, explaining that a fire at the County's waste-to-energy facility approximately 18 months earlier had created significant challenges but also opportunities to develop an improved solid waste system. She noted that years of underinvestment in critical infrastructure had contributed to current issues, including the need to replace the 40-year-old facility.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that the Administration had devoted tremendous effort and consideration to developing the recommendation over the preceding 18 months. She acknowledged that the decision had been difficult personally and for County staff who had spent extensive time researching options and preparing the recommendation. Mayor Levine Cava noted that she understood how deeply the matter affected people's lives and emphasized that she had not made the decision lightly. She stated her intent to address several misconceptions.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that throughout her career, she had dedicated herself to actions benefiting people and the environment. She expressed pride in her advocacy for protecting the environment and natural resources and stated that she took this responsibility seriously. Mayor Levine Cava emphasized that the highest priority was ensuring any new facility would be safe for people and the environment. She stated that the Administration had worked diligently to conduct rigorous scientific analyses and research to guide the recommendation, which was based on facts and careful analysis by scientific experts. Mayor Levine Cava stated that the proposal offered a solution that was safe for residents and the environment, noting that the Administration would not have brought forward the recommendation otherwise.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that County staff had visited some of the world's most advanced waste-to-energy facilities, including a 10-year-old facility in Palm Beach, as well as facilities in Japan and Europe, to observe how they protected residents and minimized public nuisance. She noted that similar to those locations, the County lacked space for new landfills. Mayor Levine Cava stated that shipping trash elsewhere was expensive long-term and unsustainable. She noted that Miami-Dade residents produced substantial waste�double the national per capita average�partly due to the thriving tourism economy.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that the Administration had consulted extensively with environmental and health experts and heard from numerous residents. She stated that the Administration believed the proposed sustainable solid waste campus at the Opa-Locka Airport West location offered the best option for moving forward in the right direction, meeting the community's growing needs using state-of-the-art technology while protecting people and the environment. Mayor Levine Cava stated that the County had received assurances of safety. She noted that state and federal agencies closely monitored waste-to-energy facilities and that new facilities were in use throughout the world, particularly in Europe.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that the proposed site would have advanced pollution and odor controls meeting or exceeding Environmental Protection Agency air quality standards. She noted that the EPA had proposed even stricter standards for new waste-to-energy facilities.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that to ensure the safest possible facility, the Administration had used the most conservative exposure models for the site, and even under those conditions, risk levels remained below EPA-acceptable thresholds. She noted that countries like Japan and Denmark, which were deeply concerned about human and environmental health, utilized waste-to-energy facilities closely integrated into the communities they served. Mayor Levine Cava stated that these facilities had proven safe despite proximity to residents. She noted that waste-to-energy was a more environmentally and fiscally sound option than landfills, reducing emissions while generating clean electricity, making it an important component of a zero-waste plan.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that the proposed sustainable solid waste campus was critical because it provided space to build a comprehensive facility incorporating not just one solution but multiple solutions with innovative zero-waste technologies.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that the Administration continued developing a Zero Waste Master Plan exploring all methods to reduce waste creation and divert waste from landfills while ensuring the County did not create dangerous methane emissions. She stated that the Administration would ensure transparency by providing prominently posted access to emissions readings.
Mayor Levine Cava stated that if the Board approved the recommendation, the site would undergo extensive permitting and regulatory approvals to ensure compatibility with safeguarding the community and environment. She stated that to the extent the facility could impact wetlands, the Administration recommended the County perform a mitigation project within the watershed consistent with the County's commitment to environmental protection and similar to other projects. Mayor Levine Cava emphasized that the County needed a solution because the quantity of waste produced would continue requiring either landfilling or waste-to-energy. She stated that while the County could progress toward zero waste, it was not currently at that point.
Chairman Gilbert III thanked everyone for attending and speaking on the matter. He noted that he had visited all proposed sites and surrounding neighborhoods and provided an overview of events preceding the resolution's presentation. Chairman Gilbert III stated that he had visited the proposed site closest to the City of Miramar and noted that the County did not permit residential developers to build that far from the urban core in Miami-Dade County. He explained that the County maintained an urban development boundary (UDB) and did not allow businesses or houses to be built beyond that boundary. Chairman Gilbert III stated that he appreciated Miramar's position and understood the city did not want any development on the proposed site. He stated his desire to be a good neighbor if possible. Chairman Gilbert III stated that he had not reached the same conclusion as the Administration regarding the Opa-Locka Airport West site because he did not agree with that location. He stated that his recommendation was the Medley site because it presented fewer environmental issues, though Medley would be very expensive. Chairman Gilbert III noted that Mr. Lowell Dunn Jr., who owned the Medley site, was present and had submitted a proposal to the Administration. He stated that he had asked Mr. Dunn Jr. about flexibility regarding the Medley site because it would solve numerous County problems if affordable, and Mr. Dunn Jr. had agreed to explore options. Chairman Gilbert III stated that Mr. Dunn Jr. had sent him a letter, which he had forwarded to Mr. Morales and the Administration for review.
Mr. Lowell Dunn Jr. appeared before the Board and stated that his conversation with the Chairman had centered on a potential land swap, exchanging property he owned in Medley on an appraised value-for-value basis for the land at Opa-Locka Airport West. He stated that in his assessment, the best use of County resources would be developing the Airport West property as a rock mine. Mr. Dunn Jr. noted potential savings of $50 million by eliminating the need to build a waste transfer station in Doral, plus $10 to $15 million in annual savings from reduced garbage transportation costs and transfer station operations. He stated that his properties were already zoned and had a Florida Statute Chapter 163 Development Agreement with the Town of Medley indicating the municipality's support for the facility.
Mr. Dunn Jr. stated that if the Airport West property could not be developed as a rock mine, he would be open to trading other properties. He expressed willingness to do whatever possible to establish cooperative relationships with Miramar, Medley, and Doral.
Commissioner Bermudez thanked Mr. Dunn Jr. and explained his understanding of the proposed land swap for the Airport West property.
Mr. Dunn Jr. clarified that the exchange would be based on appraised value, proceeding dollar-for-dollar with no cost to the County. He added that if the land swap was not feasible, he could build the facility at zero capital cost to the County. Under that scenario, the County would need a long-term put-or-pay agreement with an established price, resulting in no capital costs or taxpayer funding requirements.
When Commissioner Bermudez asked about the dollar amount for a put-or-pay agreement, Mr. Morales responded that he had received an email forwarded to him late Friday, September 13. He stated that he had spoken with Mr. Dunn Jr. about the land issue but had not discussed Mr. Dunn Jr. building the facility. Mr. Morales stated that the County needed to control facility construction and that option would not be under consideration. He stated that if the Board wished to proceed, the next step would be a more formal proposal. Mr. Morales indicated that currently the concept involved a land swap plus a maintenance fee of $5 to $10 million annually, which included fees to Medley. He stated that the Administration would need to review values because approximately half of the land consisted of a lake.
Commissioner Bermudez asked whether the County could technically execute a land swap and whether rock mining could occur at the Opa-Locka Airport West location.
Mr. Morales responded that he did not have immediate answers because the Administration had not had time to review the proposal thoroughly. He stated that Miami-Dade Aviation Department owned the Airport West location. Mr. Morales noted that one question involved whether aviation land could be transferred. He stated that he had inquired with the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, Division of Environmental Resources Management (DERM), which indicated the land could be rock mined, though he did not know whether it currently held the regulatory status required for such operations.
Mr. Dunn Jr. stated that he wished to add that regarding the land sale transaction, he was aware of a memorandum indicating $260 million. He stated that 100 percent of land sale proceeds would go to charity and he would not retain any revenue from the land sale.
Commissioner Regalado reminded the Board that the Administration had not presented the County's Solid Waste Master Plan to the Board. She noted that several items comprising the Master Plan had not been brought before the Board. Commissioner Regalado stated that she had worked on the pilot program transporting trash by train to Stuart, Florida, where officials wanted to build an incinerator. She noted that a Broward County authority was exploring similar options.
Commissioner Regalado referenced previous discussions about potentially building an incinerator through a public-private partnership because the County was aware that entities such as Florida Power & Light were interested in building an incinerator. She stated that the County knew EPA waste regulations would be changing. Commissioner Regalado noted that at a committee meeting, discussion had occurred regarding how rule changes for sludge had complicated the situation.
Commissioner Regalado stated that she was dealing with water and sewer issues and EPA regulatory changes for water. She cautioned everyone about her reasoning that the matter required a series of decisions rather than a single decision. Commissioner Regalado stated that while she understood different communities wanted a decision, the matter had multiple components requiring consideration. She noted that one issue was that the matter had not been examined comprehensively to identify all available options. Commissioner Regalado stated that the solution was a tri-county matter.
Commissioner Regalado agreed with comments that rules the County applied to private industry for development outside the UDB should apply to the County itself. She stated that while she appreciated what had been presented, a special meeting on solid waste should occur where the Board examined: the County's existing landfills; current landfill operations; increasing landfill capacity not for immediate use but for availability; options for transporting trash to other locations; which entities would accept trash and for how long; potential negotiations; tonnage considerations; and cost-effectiveness analyses. Commissioner Regalado stated that because this was an extremely expensive endeavor, it required a fiscal approach. She reiterated that the Board had not been presented with all available options and stated that the Board should examine all options to understand impacts on all parties and identify solutions that would serve current and future generations.
Mr. Morales noted that in September of the previous year, the Administration had presented the Development of an Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan in Miami-Dade County, which the Board had accepted. He reminded the Board of elements including: the sustainable solid waste campus with a mass burn facility; air quality modeling completed and presented for three sites; exploring opportunities for waste diversion; working with a zero-waste consultant; expansion of the North Dade Landfill and analysis of the South Dade Landfill, both on hold pending a facility decision; contracting for additional tonnage to provide the County concurrency; the decision not to reactivate the Resources Recovery Facility in Doral; and development of the County's Solid Waste Plan.
Commissioner Regalado noted that two items regarding landfills had come before the Board and were on hold for different reasons. She stated that landfill discussions did not depend on the current issue. Commissioner Regalado stated that discussions had occurred about diverting certain products from landfills. She stated that as the County examined waste generation and management, it should develop a comprehensive plan. Commissioner Regalado noted that if the Board made a decision that day, it would not provide the County with a solution for the next four to five years. She stated that other factors required consideration and acknowledged that the Administration wanted the Board to make a single decision.
Commissioner Regalado reiterated that she could not understand how the County could have different perspectives on what it did outside the UDB compared to what private developers were permitted to do. She expressed concern about the lack of Board discussion on the UDB issue.
Commissioner Regalado stated that discussions about wetland mitigation were complex when considering impacts on watersheds and basins.
Commissioner Regalado stated that if the Board moved forward with the recommendation, which she did not support, she asked whether a landfill would be built at the location to hold trash while awaiting construction of the new waste-to-energy facility.
Mr. Morales responded that building another landfill was not in the plans and that the County sought to divert waste from landfills.
Commissioner Regalado raised the possibility that if litigation occurred and the Board designated Airport West as the site, a future Board could designate the location for a landfill.
Mr. Morales responded that a future Board could take various actions regarding the site subject to appropriate processes. He stated that none of the sites were perfect and the Administration had noted pros and cons for each. Mr. Morales stated that the permitting process for building such facilities was lengthy. He stated that the Administration anticipated litigation at all four proposed sites. Mr. Morales emphasized that the sooner the Board made a decision, the sooner the Administration could begin the application and permitting process with relevant agencies.
Commissioner Higgins commented that waste-to-energy facilities were preferable to landfills. She stated that the Board should make a decision that day and proceed with the recommended site.
Commissioner Higgins stated that if Medley presented a better arrangement at equivalent cost, the Board could make an alternative decision at the next Board meeting. She stated for the record that moving the facility out of the City of Doral would cost money. Commissioner Higgins noted that the County would proceed without a contribution and fees would increase for all County residents. She stated that the City of Doral must present a plan to pay incremental capital costs estimated at $120 to $125 million for the facility plus $50 million for a transfer station the County did not currently need. She noted that operation and management of the transfer facility was estimated at $12 million annually.
Commissioner Higgins reiterated that the Board needed to ensure Doral formally passed tax increment financing (TIF), and if the TIF could not cover costs, Doral needed to be prepared to issue a general obligation bond for the facility.
Commissioner Bermudez stated that this was an extremely difficult decision for the Board. He noted that one concern regarding the Medley site was its continued proximity to Doral and its residents.
Commissioner Bermudez referenced surrounding communities including Hialeah Gardens and Hialeah and stated that he was sensitive to residents' concerns in those communities. He noted that he had discussed with Mr. Morales approximately one year earlier the possibility of conversations with Broward County about a joint facility serving at least the two counties�Miami-Dade and Broward. Commissioner Bermudez stated that no progress had been made and that Broward County would face similar issues eventually. He noted that the Northwest Wellfield was in close proximity to District 12 residents.
Commissioner Bermudez stated that a decision needed to be made and that he agreed with the County Mayor's conclusion. He indicated he could proffer a motion.
Commissioner Hardemon referenced a Miami News article and read portions into the record. He stated that the Board should take time to consider the proposal and think carefully before making a final decision. Commissioner Hardemon expressed support for Commissioner Regalado's position that a series of events needed to occur before the Board decided on the matter. He encouraged consideration of deferral and moved to defer the resolution.
Commissioner Regalado seconded the motion.
Chairman Gilbert III stated he opposed deferral to no date certain but agreed that all parties needed more time to review all possibilities. He noted that Doral had passed a resolution directing their City Manager to negotiate and present options to the Doral City Council. Chairman Gilbert III stated that the County should understand Doral's financial contribution when making its decision. He noted that the existing resolution required Doral to present a financial proposal 60 days after the Board selected a site.
Chairman Gilbert III stated that a date certain was needed for any deferral and clarification was required regarding what the Board wanted the Administration to accomplish during the deferral period. He stated that he would not permit additional public comment on the item.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins spoke regarding the deferral. She expressed concern that the Board was relying on and at the mercy of a single vendor to haul 100 percent of the County's waste for the next ten years, while the County's waste generation was double the national average. Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated she was uncomfortable from an environmental perspective that the County would landfill 100 percent of its waste for the next ten years. She stated she supported deferral to a date certain. Commissioner Cohen Higgins reminded the Board of directives given to the Administration at the September 19, 2023 Board meeting (Resolution Number R-821-23). She stated she would only support moving the facility outside the City of Doral if there was substantial financial contribution because relocation would cost taxpayers additional money.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated that before the Board decided, increased costs must be offset by financial contributions from the municipality that would benefit greatly. She stated that Miami-Dade County needed to know what the financial contribution entailed. Commissioner Cohen Higgins stated that if the County was going to defer and delay the decision, the Board should establish specific criteria outlining differences from the current proposal. She stated agreement with Commissioner Regalado that the Board should be careful about policies set for private developers to ensure the County itself adhered to its own policies, specifically regarding the UDB. She reiterated her request for vetting of the Medley site offer to determine viability.
Commissioner Cabrera suggested amending Commissioner Hardemon's deferral motion to specify that within 60 days, Doral would submit its proposal regarding financial contributions and other specifics.
Commissioner Hardemon responded that he was amenable to a 60-day timeframe to provide sufficient time for reviewing information gathered on the matter.
Chairman Gilbert III stated that the Board should proceed with Commissioner Hardemon's deferral motion or schedule a special meeting on the matter.
Senator Garcia stated that he opposed the Opa-Locka Airport West site. He stated he had concerns about the UDB and agreed with colleagues' comments regarding environmental impacts, the newly proposed site, and the City of Doral's contribution.
Senator Garcia urged the Administration to present additional information to Board members.
Commissioner Rodriguez agreed with colleagues' comments. He noted that Doral needed to contribute financially and stated he was not inclined to support deferral that day. Commissioner Rodriguez asked what would be presented to the Board in 60 days. He noted that Doral did not know contribution amounts because the Board had not yet selected a site.
Chairman Gilbert III noted the estimated cost of $1.6 billion to build the facility in Medley.
Mr. Morales noted meetings with Doral to develop an agreement framework. He identified three issues: financial contribution amounts; defining what constituted "moving out of Doral"; and use of the old Resources Recovery Facility site for a transfer station. Mr. Morales stated that to the extent the Board could provide guidance or keep those three issues in mind, they were likely the most controversial matters with Doral.
Chairman Gilbert III stated that Doral would not require a transfer station if the Medley site were selected. He stated that within 60 days, negotiations should occur and a proposal should return to the Board for consideration.
Commissioner Regalado reiterated her comments about the County's pilot program transporting trash to Stuart, Florida via train. She stated she wanted everyone aware that not all County trash was placed in County landfills. She noted that additional options should be presented to the Board regarding trash disposal because other locations could accept County waste, which had never been discussed.
Commissioner Regalado stated that discussion was necessary because it impacted financial modeling. As the Board decided expenditure levels, financial modeling was needed for waste disposal management leading up to any decision about building an incinerator. She asked the Board to consider bringing the item to a special meeting along with landfill items to resolve those issues as well.
When Commissioner Regalado inquired about ash disposal from an incinerator, Mr. Morales noted that the Doral site had an ash monofill with remaining capacity, and for any other location, ash would be transported to a landfill.
Commissioner Regalado stated that a landfill component would exist for any incinerator. She stated the need for the Board to be clear about different components of the matter. Commissioner Regalado noted that the County could send trash to landfills in Fort Pierce and Okeechobee. She stated that other options existed at different price points where the Board could make decisions enabling financial modeling to determine precisely what the County needed to build.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins asked the Solid Waste Management Director how much County garbage was currently being landfilled in its entirety since the County did not have an incinerator.
Ms. Aneisha Daniel responded that 65,000 tons were being recycled while over two million tons of waste were being landfilled. She clarified that tonnage was not being sent to Stuart.
Chairman Gilbert III asked the Administration to conduct a complete analysis of all proposed alternative sites and specifically evaluate the fiscal impact and viability of the Medley land swap option. He also requested that the Administration meet with the City of Doral to discuss the city's financial contribution.
Chairman Gilbert III requested that the aforementioned information be provided to the Board of County Commissioners prior to the proposed legislation being placed on an agenda for consideration, which he anticipated would be the November 6, 2024 Board meeting.
Following Chairman Gilbert III's comments, Commissioner Bermudez reminded the Chairman about the land swap option and asked whether the Board would consider that alternative.
Chairman Gilbert III stated that the Okeechobee site was also an option but did not necessarily solve environmental problems and would present the same issues as the Opa-Locka Airport West site. He stated that Medley would be the ideal site to solve the County's problems at the right price compared to other proposed sites.
Commissioner Bermudez respectfully disagreed with Chairman Gilbert III and stated he wanted to ensure all four sites were considered.
Commissioner Cabrera stated that in the Administration's negotiations with Doral, the goal should be meeting financing requirements whether building in Doral or elsewhere. He stated he wanted to ensure that component was included.
Chairman Gilbert III stated that ongoing costs would be incurred on the matter.
Hearing no further questions or comments, the Board voted for the deferral of the foregoing proposed resolution to the November 6, 2024.
|
|
|
11A6
|
|
| |
241449
|
Resolution
|
Juan Carlos Bermudez
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION MODIFYING RESOLUTION NO. R-629-18 WHICH ESTABLISHED COUNTY POLICY THAT PROHIBITED CERTAIN COUNTY SUBSIDIES RELATED TO THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE AMERICAN DREAM MIAMI PROJECT [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 240381]
|
Deferred
to
No Date Certain
Resolution
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
During the consideration of the motion to set the agenda, the Board deferred the foregoing proposed resolution to no date certain as requested by the prime sponsor.
|
|
| |
7/8/2024
Forwarded to BCC with a favorable recommendation with committee amendment(s) by the Chairmans Policy Council & Intergov. Affairs Cmte.
|
|
|
11B
|
ADDITIONAL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
|
| |
|
12
|
COUNTY MAYOR
|
| |
|
13
|
COUNTY ATTORNEY
|
| |
|
14
|
ITEMS SUBJECT TO 4-DAY RULE
|
| |
|
14A1
|
|
| |
241621
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A NON-COMPETITIVE DESIGNATED PURCHASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1(B)(3) OF THE COUNTY CODE BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT; AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY IN AN AMOUNT UP TO $1,997,000.00 WITH JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., IN AN AMOUNT UP TO $3,653,000.00 WITH RGEN ENTERPRISES LLC DBA COOL WATER AIR CONDITIONING, AND IN AN AMOUNT UP TO $710,000.00 WITH SOUTHERN CHILLER OF MIAMI, INC. DBA SOUTHEASTERN CHILLER SERVICES FOR A TOTAL MODIFIED CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $16,254,000.00 UNDER CONTRACT NO. FB-01556 FOR THE PURCHASE OF HVAC CHILLERS, EQUIPMENT, AND WATER TREATMENT SERVICES FOR THE MIAMI DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT, INCLUDING ANY CANCELLATION OR EXTENSIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1 OF THE COUNTY CODE AND IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-38(Strategic Procurement)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-787-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 12 - 0
Absent: Rodriguez
|
| |
9/11/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson due to meeting cancellation by the Airport and Economic Development Committee
|
|
|
14A2
|
|
| |
241564
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Kevin Marino Cabrera
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY FOR A NOMINAL SUM OF $1.00 TO INSTALL, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN ELECTRICAL POWER FACILITIES AT THE OKEECHOBEE METRORAIL STATION PROPERTY AT 2005 W. OKEECHOBEE ROAD, HIALEAH, FLORIDA, AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO AMEND EASEMENT EXHIBIT A UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, EXECUTE THE EASEMENT CONVEYANCE, TAKE ALL ACTIONS TO EFFECTUATE SAME AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN(Transportation and Public Works)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-823-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 10 - 0
Absent: Cabrera , Rodriguez , Garc�a
|
| |
9/11/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Transportation, Mobility, and Planning Cmte.
|
|
|
14A3
|
|
| |
241570
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A NON-COMPETITIVE DESIGNATED PURCHASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1(B)(3) OF THE COUNTY CODE BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT; AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY IN AN AMOUNT UP TO $750,000.00 FOR A TOTAL MODIFIED CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,000,000.00 FOR CONTRACT NO. BW-10404 FOR ON-DEMAND TRANSIT VOUCHERS (BETTER BUS NETWORK) FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS; AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND EXERCISE ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT, INCLUDING ANY CANCELLATION OR EXTENSIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-8.1 OF THE COUNTY CODE AND IMPLEMENTING ORDER 3-38 [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 241173](Transportation and Public Works)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-824-24
Mover: Sen. Rene Garcia
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 12 - 0
Absent: McGhee
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed resolution into the record.
Senator Garcia briefly commented on the need for the Department of Transportation and Public Works Director to review contracts in response to an incident involving one of the contractors.
Mr. Morales explained that the incident involved an electronic sign that had been hacked, resulting in an inappropriate message being displayed. He stated that the Department had identified and corrected the issue and was working with the contractor to implement preventive measures to ensure similar incidents did not occur in the future.
Senator Garcia stated that if such incidents could not be prevented, the Department should consider terminating those contracts.
Hearing no further questions or comments, the Board proceeded to vote on the foregoing proposed resolution, as presented
Chairman Gilbert III requested County Mr. Morales to have the Miami-Dade Police Department investigate the recent signage incident involving the contractor, which had displayed unauthorized political messaging on one of its vehicles.
|
|
| |
9/11/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Transportation, Mobility, and Planning Cmte.
|
|
|
14A4
|
|
| |
241646
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
|
| |
|
| |
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 BETWEEN MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, LLC AND MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FOR THE PROJECT TITLED RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY � NORTH SIDE SHORELINE AND ROADWAY PROTECTION, CONTRACT NUMBER 422003-18-010, INCREASING THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $1,00,000.00, RESULTING IN A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $13,756,791.06 AND TO EXTEND THE CONTRACT DURATION BY 60 NON-COMPENSABLE CALENDAR DAYS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2-8.3 OF THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY CODE(Transportation and Public Works)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-825-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 10 - 0
Absent: Cabrera , Rodriguez , Garc�a
|
| |
9/11/2024
Forwarded to the BCC by the BCC Chairperson with a favorable recommendation by the Transportation, Mobility, and Planning Cmte.
|
|
|
14A5
|
|
| |
241683
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Anthony Rodriguez
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE FUNDING AGREEMENTS WITH STATE OF FLORIDA AGENCIES FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF THOSE STATE FUNDS THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE APPROPRIATED IN THE STATE�S BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025, IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $19,136,563.00 AND WHICH REQUIRE MATCHING FUNDS OF UP TO $5,603,688.00, FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PROJECTS, SERVICES, AND INITIATIVES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THIS BOARD TO SEEK FUNDING FROM THE LEGISLATURE AS IDENTIFIED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM PROVIDED THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ARE SATISFIED; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE GRANT AGREEMENTS WITH STATE AGENCIES FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS PURSUANT TO THE BISCAYNE BAY WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT AND FLORIDA RECREATION DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAMS PROVIDED THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ARE SATISFIED; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF SUCH STATE GRANT FUNDS PROVIDED THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ARE SATISFIED; AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO PREPARE QUARTERLY REPORTS PERTAINING TO THE STATE FUNDING DESCRIBED IN THIS RESOLUTION, IDENTIFYING WHETHER SUCH FUNDS WERE SPENT, AND IF SO, WHETHER SUCH FUNDS WERE SPENT IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL FUNDING REQUEST SUBMITTED TO THE STATE(Office of Management and Budget)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-788-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 10 - 0
Absent: Cabrera , Rodriguez , Garc�a
|
|
14A6
|
|
| |
241690
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Eileen Higgins
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH�S CODESIGNATION OF THAT PORTION OF 9TH STREET BETWEEN OCEAN DRIVE AND WEST AVENUE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AS �COMMISSIONER NANCY LIEBMAN WAY�
|
Adopted
Resolution R-826-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 10 - 0
Absent: Cabrera , Rodriguez , Garc�a
|
|
14A6 SUPPLEMENT
|
|
| |
241713
|
Supplement
|
|
| |
|
| |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH�S CODESIGNATION OF THAT PORTION OF 9TH STREET BETWEEN OCEAN DRIVE AND WEST AVENUE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AS �COMMISSIONER NANCY LIEBMAN WAY�(Clerk of the Board)
|
Presented
|
|
14A7
|
|
| |
241712
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
Kevin Marino Cabrera
Sen. Rene Garcia
Eileen Higgins
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION CONDEMNING ALL FORMS OF POLITICALLY MOTIVATED VIOLENCE WHICH UNDERMINE THE FABRIC OF THE AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
|
Adopted
Resolution R-827-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 10 - 0
Absent: Cabrera , Rodriguez , Garc�a
|
|
14A8
|
|
| |
241711
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
Marleine Bastien
Sen. Rene Garcia
Eileen Higgins
Micky Steinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE HAITIAN COMMUNITY TO THE FABRIC OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND CONDEMNING FALSE GENERALIZATIONS OR INSINUATIONS THAT CAST THE HAITIAN POPULATION IN A NEGATIVE LIGHT
|
Adopted
Resolution R-828-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 10 - 0
Absent: Cabrera , Rodriguez , Garc�a
|
|
14A9
|
|
| |
241710
|
Ordinance
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
Sen. Rene Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY 30X30 VISION COUNCIL; AMENDING SECTION 2-2471 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ALLOWING THE BOARD TO ADD VOTING MEMBERS TO THE COUNCIL BY RESOLUTION; ADDING VOTING MEMBER TO THE COUNCIL; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
|
Adopted on first reading
Public Hearing:
October 1, 2024
Ordinance 24-103
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Marleine Bastien
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed ordinance into the record.
The foregoing proposed ordinance was adopted on first reading and set for public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on October 1, 2024 at 9:30 a.m.
|
|
|
14A10
|
|
| |
241708
|
Ordinance
|
Eileen Higgins
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE MULTIMODAL MOBILITY IMPACT FEE; AMENDING SECTION 33E-8 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; CORRECTING A DESCRIPTIVE ERROR IN FACTOR 9B AND PROVIDING CLARIFICATION RELATING TO THE COSTS FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE(Regulatory and Economic Resources)
|
Adopted on 1st reading, PH & 2nd reading scheduled for 10.1.24 BCC
Ordinance 24-104
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Marleine Bastien
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
CA Bonzon-Keenan read the title of the foregoing proposed ordinance into the record.
The foregoing proposed ordinance was adopted on first reading and set for public hearing and seconded reading before the Board of County Commissioners on October 1, 2024 at 9:30 a.m.
SPECIAL NOTE: See report under Agenda Items 15B1, Legislative File Number 241407 and 15F2, Legislative File Number 241834 for further details.
|
|
|
14A11
|
|
| |
241714
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Raquel A. Regalado
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO INITIATE NEGOTIATIONS FOR PROPOSAL � NO. 2023-01-GWPG-GIBSON PLAZA/WEST GROVE REDEVELOPMENT WITH THE HIGHEST RANK PROPOSERS, RELATED URBAN LLC FOR GROUP 1 (GIBSON PLAZA), AND INTEGRAL FLORIDA LLC FOR GROUP 2 (WEST GROVE) FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF GIBSON PLAZA AND WEST GROVE HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS(Public Housing and Community Development)
|
Adopted
Resolution R-829-24
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 10 - 0
Absent: Cabrera , Rodriguez , Garc�a
|
|
14B1
|
|
| |
241695
|
Report
|
Oliver G. Gilbert, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
STUDY TO EVALUATE THE FEASIBILITY OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY OBTAINING ELECTIVE PAY CLEAN ENERGY TAX CREDITS AVAILABLE UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE THROUGH THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT(Mayor)
|
Accepted
Report
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Raquel A. Regalado
Vote: 10 - 0
Absent: Cabrera , Rodriguez , Garc�a
|
|
15
|
CLERK OF THE BOARD
|
| |
|
15B
|
REPORTS
|
| |
|
15B1
|
|
| |
241407
|
Report
|
|
| |
|
| |
PROPOSED PUBLIC HEARING DATES FOR ORDINANCES SUBMITTED FOR FIRST READING ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2024(Clerk of the Board)
|
Approved as amended
Report
Mover: Eileen Higgins
Seconder: Oliver G. Gilbert, III
Vote: 13 - 0
|
| |
REPORT:
Pursuant to a motion read into the record by County Attorney Geri Bonzon-Keenan, Commissioner Higgins moved to (1) suspend the Board�s Rules of Procedure requiring committee review for Agenda Item 14A10, Legislative File Number 241708; (2) set the public hearing and second reading for this item at the October 1, 2024, Board meeting; (3) direct the Clerk of the Board to publish all necessary notices; and (4) amend Agenda Item 15B1, Legislative File Number 241407 accordingly. This motion was seconded was seconded by Chairman Gilbert III, and upon being put to a vote, passed by a vote of 12-0 (Commissioner Cabrera was absent).
SPECIAL NOTE: See report under Agenda Item 14A10, Legislative File Number 241708 and 15F2, Legislative File Number 241834 for further details.
|
|
|
15B2
|
|
| |
241628
|
Report
|
|
| |
|
| |
APPROVAL OF THE CLERK�S SUMMARY OF MINUTES FOR THE FOLLOWING MIAMI-DADE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETINGS [AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DIVISION]:
� APRIL 16, 2024 (REGULAR)(Clerk of the Board)
|
Approved
Report
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
15B3
|
|
| |
241626
|
Report
|
|
| |
|
| |
CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF THE PRIMARY ELECTION CONDUCTED ON AUGUST 20, 2024(Clerk of the Board)
|
Accepted
Report
Mover: Marleine Bastien
Seconder: Sen. Rene Garcia
Vote: 13 - 0
|
|
15C
|
COUNTY ADVISORY BOARD APPOINTMENTS
|
| |
|
15C1
|
|
| |
241752
|
Report
|
|
| |
|
| |
APPOINTMENT OF ARMANDO RIVIERA TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ELDER AFFAIRS ADVISORY BOARD
|
Approved
Mover: Kevin Marino Cabrera
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 12 - 0
Absent: McGhee
|
| |
REPORT:
The foregoing appointment was made by Commissioner Cabrera.
|
|
|
15D
|
COUNTY ADVISORY BOARD APPOINTMENTS BY BALLOT
|
| |
|
15E
|
MAYOR�S REQUEST FOR ALLOCATIONS FROM DISCRETIONARY OR IN-KIND RESERVE FUNDS
|
| |
|
15F
|
NON-AGENDA ITEMS
|
| |
|
15F1
|
|
| |
241751
|
Resolution
Clerk's Official Copy
|
Keon Hardemon
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R-455-24; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY TO PROVIDE OR ARRANGE FOR TRANSPORTATION OF THE CHILDREN�S TRUST THRIVE BY 5 STUDENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ZERO DROWNINGS MIAMI-DADE PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR�S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ANY AGREEMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE PROVISION OF THESE SERVICES AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDING FOR THESE SERVICES
|
Adopted
Resolution R-830-24
Mover: Keon Hardemon
Seconder: Anthony Rodriguez
Vote: 12 - 0
Absent: McGhee
|
|
15F2
|
|
| |
241834
|
Report
|
|
| |
|
| |
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HIGGINS REGARDING AGENDA ITEM 14A10, LEGISLATIVE FILE NUMBER 241708 AND AGENDA ITEM 15B1, LEGISLATIVE FILE 241407
|
Presented
|
| |
REPORT:
Pursuant to a motion read into the record by County Attorney Geri Bonzon-Keenan, Commissioner Higgins moved to (1) suspend the Board�s Rules of Procedure requiring committee review for Agenda Item 14A10, Legislative File Number 241708; (2) set the public hearing and second reading for this item at the October 1, 2024, Board meeting; (3) direct the Clerk of the Board to publish all necessary notices; and (4) amend Agenda Item 15B1, Legislative File Number 241407 accordingly. This motion was seconded was seconded by Chairman Gilbert III, and upon being put to a vote, passed by a vote of 12-0 (Commissioner Cabrera was absent).
SPECIAL NOTE: See Agenda Item 14A10, Legislative File Number 241708 and Agenda Item 15B1, Legislative File Number 241407.
|
|
|
19
|
ADJOURNMENT
|
| |
| |
REPORT:
Hearing no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m.
|
|
|
3
|
CONSENT AGENDA
|
| |
|
| 8/7/2026 |
|
|
|
Agenda Key: 5140 |